首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores.
【24h】

A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores.

机译:对下肢损伤严重程度评分的临床效用进行前瞻性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: High-energy trauma to the lower extremity presents challenges with regard to reconstruction and rehabilitation. Failed efforts at limb salvage are associated with increased patient mortality and high hospital costs. Lower-extremity injury-severity scoring systems were developed to assist the surgical team with the initial decision to amputate or salvage a limb. The purpose of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of five lower-extremity injury-severity scoring systems. METHODS: Five hundred and fifty-six high-energy lower-extremity injuries were prospectively evaluated with use of five injury-severity scoring systems for lower-extremity trauma designed to assist in the decision-making process for the care of patients with such injuries. Four hundred and seven limbs remained in the salvage pathway six months after the injury. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS); the Limb Salvage Index (LSI); the Predictive Salvage Index (PSI); the Nerve Injury, Ischemia, Soft-Tissue Injury, Skeletal Injury, Shock, and Age of Patient Score (NISSSA); and the Hannover Fracture Scale-97 (HFS-97) for ischemic and nonischemic limbs. The scores were analyzed in two ways: including and excluding limbs that required immediate amputation. RESULTS: The analysis did not validate the clinical utility of any of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores. The high specificity of the scores in all of the patient subgroups did confirm that low scores could be used to predict limb-salvage potential. The converse, however, was not true. The low sensitivity of the indices failed to support the validity of the scores as predictors of amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-extremity injury-severity scores at or above the amputation threshold should be cautiously used by a surgeon who must decide the fate of a lower extremity with a high-energy injury.
机译:背景:对下肢的高能量创伤在重建和康复方面提出了挑战。肢体抢救失败会增加患者死亡率,并增加医院费用。开发了下肢损伤严重度评分系统,以协助外科团队初步决定截肢或抢救肢体。本研究的目的是前瞻性评估五个下肢损伤严重程度评分系统的临床效用。方法:采用五个下肢创伤严重程度评分系统,前瞻性评估了556例高能下肢损伤,这些评分系统旨在协助决策过程,以照顾此类受伤的患者。受伤六个月后,四百零七的肢体仍保留在打捞通道中。计算了肢体弯曲严重度评分(MESS)的敏感性,特异性和受体工作特征曲线下的面积;肢体救助指数(LSI);预测救助指数(PSI);神经损伤,局部缺血,软组织损伤,骨骼损伤,休克和患者年龄评分(NISSSA);汉诺威97号骨折量表(HFS-97)用于缺血和非缺血肢体。对分数进行了两种分析:包括和排除需要立即截肢的四肢。结果:该分析未验证任何下肢损伤严重度评分的临床实用性。在所有患者亚组中得分的高特异性确实证实了低得分可用于预测肢体抢救潜力。相反,事实并非如此。指数的低敏感性无法支持分数作为截肢预测指标的有效性。结论:外科医生应谨慎使用下肢损伤严重程度评分,以达到截肢阈值或更高,必须决定下肢高能量损伤的命运。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号