...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >History of symptom triggers in patients presenting to the emergency department for asthma
【24h】

History of symptom triggers in patients presenting to the emergency department for asthma

机译:向哮喘急诊求诊的患者的症状触发病史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives. Understanding triggers is important for managing asthma particularly for patients who seek emergency department (ED) care for exacerbations. The objectives of this analysis were to delineate self-reported triggers in ED patients and to assess associations between triggers and asthma knowledge, severity, and quality of life. Methods. At the time of an ED visit, 296 patients were asked what were their usual asthma triggers based on a checklist of 25 potential items, and what they thought specifically precipitated their current ED visit. Using standardized scales, patients also were asked about asthma knowledge, severity, and quality of life. Results. The mean age was 44 years and 72% were women. Patients cited a mean of 12 triggers; most patients had diverse triggers spanning respiratory infections, environmental irritants, emotions, allergens, weather, and exercise. Patients with more triggers were more likely to be women (odds ratio (OR) 2.0, confidence interval (CI) = 1.3, 3.2, p = .002), obese (OR = 1.7, CI = 1.1, 2.5, p = .01), and to not have a smoking history (OR = 1.9, CI 1.3, 2.9, p = .001). There were no associations between number of triggers and current age, age at diagnosis, education, socioeconomic status, or race/ethnicity. Patients who cited more triggers had more frequent flares (OR = 1.1, CI = 1.1, 1.2, p < .0001), worse quality of life scores (OR = 1.6, CI = 1.1, 2.4, p = .02), and were more likely to have been previously hospitalized for asthma (OR = 1.9, CI = 1.3, 2.9, p = .003) and to have previously required oral corticosteroids (OR 2.9, CI 1.6, 5.1, p .003). There was little clustering of specific triggers according to the variables we considered except for more frequent animal allergy in patients diagnosed at a younger age (OR = 2.8, CI = 1.7, 4.5, p < .0001) and worse quality of life in patients citing emotional stress as a trigger (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.5, 4.0, p = .0002). Patients attributed their current ED visit to multiple precipitants, particularly respiratory infections and weather, and these were concordant with what they reported were known triggers. Conclusions. Patients presenting to the ED for asthma reported multiple triggers spanning diverse classes of precipitants and having more triggers was associated with worse clinical status. ED patients should be instructed that although it may not be possible to eliminate all triggers, mitigating even some triggers can be helpful (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00110409).
机译:目标。了解触发因素对于控制哮喘非常重要,特别是对于寻求急诊科急诊加重病情的患者。该分析的目的是在ED患者中描述自我报告的触发因素,并评估触发因素与哮喘知识,严重程度和生活质量之间的关联。方法。在进行急诊就诊时,根据25项潜在项目的清单,询问了296例患者通常的哮喘触发因素是什么,他们认为是什么导致了目前的急诊就诊。使用标准化的量表,还询问患者有关哮喘的知识,严重程度和生活质量。结果。平均年龄为44岁,女性为72%。患者平均列举了12个触发因素;大多数患者的触发因素包括呼吸道感染,环境刺激物,情绪,过敏原,天气和运动。触发因素更多的患者更有可能是女性(优势比(OR)2.0,置信区间(CI)= 1.3、3.2,p = 0.002),肥胖(OR = 1.7,CI = 1.1、2.5,p = 0.01) ),并且没有吸烟史(OR = 1.9,CI 1.3,2.9,p = .001)。触发因素的数量与当前年龄,诊断年龄,受教育程度,社会经济地位或种族/民族之间没有关联。引证更多触发因素的患者发作频繁(OR = 1.1,CI = 1.1,1.2,p <.0001),生活质量评分较差(OR = 1.6,CI = 1.1,2.4,p = .02),并且更可能以前因哮喘住院(OR = 1.9,CI = 1.3,2.9,p = .003)和以前需要口服糖皮质激素的患者(OR 2.9,CI 1.6,5.1,p .003)。根据我们考虑的变量,几乎没有特定触发因素的聚类,除了在较年轻的年龄段被诊断出的患者(OR = 2.8,CI = 1.7、4.5,p <.0001)和较差的生活质量,以及被引用患者的生活质量较差之外,情绪压力作为触发因素(OR = 2.5,CI = 1.5,4.0,p = .0002)。患者将其当前的急诊就诊归因于多种沉淀物,尤其是呼吸道感染和天气,这些与他们报告的已知诱因一致。结论。向急诊科就哮喘的患者报告了多种诱因,其跨越了不同类别的沉淀剂,而具有更多诱因与临床状况恶化相关。应指示ED患者,尽管可能无法消除所有触发因素,但减轻某些触发因素也可能有所帮助(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00110409)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号