首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Bamboo and Rattan >Comparison of yield and quality of bamboo charcoal produced by traditional methods
【24h】

Comparison of yield and quality of bamboo charcoal produced by traditional methods

机译:传统方法生产的竹炭的产量和质量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A traditional pit method and a portable drum method were evaluated for the production of charcoal from the wastes of Bambusa bambos. An indigenous earthen pot method, traditionally used in Kerala, India for the production of teak wood distillate wherecharcoal is a byproduct, was also evaluated. The methods differed significantly in yield and quality of charcoal produced. The pit and drum methods gave higher yield of charcoal, but with low quality, whereas the earthen pot method gave a lower yield but with high quality. Charcoal with high volatile content (14-20%) and low fixed carbon (74-76%) suitable for domestic use was obtained from the pit and drum methods, while charcoal with low volatile content (9%) and high fixed carbon (84%) suitable for industrial use was obtained from the earthen pot method. In general, bamboo charcoal had high ash content (7.5%) and it was alkaline (pH 8.9-9.7) and brittle, with poor hardness.
机译:评估了传统的坑式方法和便携式鼓式方法从班巴竹的废物中生产木炭的方法。还评估了传统上在印度喀拉拉邦用于生产以木炭为副产品的柚木馏出物的土制土锅方法。这些方法在生产的木炭的产量和质量上有显着差异。坑和鼓法的木炭收率较高,但质量较低,而土锅法的木炭收率较低,但质量较高。通过坑式和鼓式方法获得了适合家庭使用的高挥发分(14-20%)和低固定碳(74-76%)的木炭,而低挥发分(9%)和高固定碳(84)的木炭通过土锅法获得适合工业使用的%)。通常,竹炭的灰分含量高(7.5%),呈碱性(pH 8.9-9.7)且易碎,硬度差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号