首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics >Comparison of three water erosion prediction methods (Cs-137, WEPP, USLE)in south-east Brazilian sugarcane production
【24h】

Comparison of three water erosion prediction methods (Cs-137, WEPP, USLE)in south-east Brazilian sugarcane production

机译:巴西东南部甘蔗生产中三种水蚀预测方法(Cs-137,WEPP,USLE)的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Soil erosion is the main degradation process in tropical agroecosystems. Soil erosion rates should be considered in land evaluation and conservation planning assessment. The methods available for erosion prediction are not sufficiently calibrated or validated for tropical soils, climates and crops. Thus, differences in estimated soil erosion values may be expected, even if considering the same input data. Three soil erosion estimation methods (USLE, WEPP and Cs-137) were applied to the same watershed cultivated with sugarcane in Southeastern Brazil (near Piracicaba S 22 degrees 38 ' 54 " and W 47 degrees 45 ' 40 "). The absolute erosion rate values and the differences in the spatial distribution were evaluated. The overall results suggested that there are important differences in soil loss estimated by the three methods. The differences occurred in both, mean values and geographic locations. The sequence of mean soil loss values was USLECs-137>WEPP and standard deviation values USLE>WEPP>Cs-137, indicating that USLE predicted the highest erosion values and spread out over the widest range. The poor geographical coincidence of the results is evidence that the values resulting from none calibrated soil erosion methods should be considered only as qualitative indications. The method selection should consider overall site variability in relation to known sensitive method factors.
机译:土壤侵蚀是热带农业生态系统中的主要退化过程。在土地评估和保护规划评估中应考虑土壤侵蚀率。用于侵蚀预测的方法尚未针对热带土壤,气候和农作物进行充分校准或验证。因此,即使考虑相同的输入数据,估计的土壤侵蚀价值也会有所不同。三种土壤侵蚀评估方法(USLE,WEPP和Cs-137)应用于巴西东南部(皮拉西卡巴(Piracicaba)S 22度38'54“和W 47度45'40”附近)甘蔗种植的同一流域。评估了绝对侵蚀率值和空间分布的差异。总体结果表明,通过三种方法估算的土壤流失存在重要差异。均值和地理位置均出现差异。平均土壤流失值的顺序为USLE Cs-137> WEPP,标准偏差值USLE> WEPP> Cs-137,表明USLE预测了最高的侵蚀值并在最宽的范围内分布。结果的地理重合性差,证明没有校准的土壤侵蚀方法得出的值仅应作为定性指标。方法的选择应考虑相对于已知敏感方法因素的总体位点变异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号