首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions >Effect on Platelet Reactivity From a Prasugrel Loading Dose After a Clopidogrel Loading Dose Compared With a Prasugrel Loading Dose Alone: Transferring From Clopidogrel Loading Dose to Prasugrel Loading Dose in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients (TRIPLET): A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Effect on Platelet Reactivity From a Prasugrel Loading Dose After a Clopidogrel Loading Dose Compared With a Prasugrel Loading Dose Alone: Transferring From Clopidogrel Loading Dose to Prasugrel Loading Dose in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients (TRIPLET): A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:氯吡格雷负荷剂量后与普拉格雷负荷剂量相比对普拉格雷负荷剂量对血小板反应性的影响:急性冠脉综合征患者(TRIPLET)从氯吡格雷负荷剂量转移至普拉格雷负荷剂量(TRIPLET):一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background-: Adding a prasugrel loading dose (LD) to a clopidogrel LD could be desirable because clopidogrel may fail to provide adequate levels of platelet inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods and Results-: The pharmacodynamic response of prasugrel 60 mg LD alone was compared with prasugrel 60 mg or 30 mg added <=24 hours to clopidogrel 600 mg in Transferring from Clopidogrel Loading Dose to Prasugrel Loading Dose in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients study-a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 3-arm, parallel, active-comparator controlled study. Two hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to 3 LD strategies: placebo plus prasugrel 60 mg, clopidogrel 600 mg plus prasugrel 60 mg, or clopidogrel 600 mg plus prasugrel 30 mg. Platelet function was assessed using VerifyNow P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) immediately before prasugrel LD, and 2, 6, 24, and 72 hours after prasugrel LD in 149 patients with evaluable platelet function studies. At 6 hours after the prasugrel 60 mg LD, the least squares mean (95% confidence interval) difference between placebo/prasugrel 60 mg and clopidogrel 600 mg/prasugrel 60 mg (primary outcome) was 22.2 (-11.0 to 55.5; P=0.19; least squares mean PRU 57.9 versus 35.6, respectively). For clopidogrel 600 mg/prasugrel 30 mg (least squares mean PRU, 53.9), the difference was 3.9 (-28.2 to 36.1; P=0.81) versus placebo/prasugrel 60 mg. No significant differences in PRU were observed at any time point across the 3 groups. There were few bleeding events observed regardless of treatment.Conclusions-: Platelet reactivity with prasugrel 60 mg LD added to clopidogrel 600 mg LD was not significantly different compared with prasugrel 60 mg LD alone in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
机译:背景-:在接受氯吡格雷的急性冠脉综合征患者中,氯吡格雷可能无法提供足够水平的血小板抑制作用,因此在氯吡格雷LD上增加普拉格雷负荷剂量(LD)可能是可取的。方法和结果-:普拉格雷的药效学响应在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,从氯吡格雷负荷剂量向普拉格雷负荷剂量的转移研究中,将60 mg LD单独与普拉格雷60 mg或30 mg添加至氯吡格雷600 mg≤24小时(在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中研究)进行了一项多中心,随机,双盲,双盲研究。虚拟,3臂,并行,主动比较器控制的算例。 282例患者被随机分配到3种LD策略:安慰剂加普拉格雷60 mg,氯吡格雷600 mg加普拉格雷60 mg或氯吡格雷600 mg加普拉格雷30 mg。在149例可评估血小板功能研究中,在普拉格雷LD之前,普拉格雷LD后2、6、24和72小时,使用VerifyNow P2Y12反应单位(PRU)评估了血小板功能。普拉格雷60 mg LD后6小时,安慰剂/普拉格雷60 mg与氯吡格雷600 mg /普拉格雷60 mg(主要结局)之间的最小二乘均值(95%置信区间)差异为22.2(-11.0至55.5; P = 0.19) ;最小二乘分别表示PRU 57.9和35.6)。对于600 mg氯吡格雷/普拉格雷30毫克(最小二乘均值PRU,53.9),与安慰剂/普拉格雷60毫克相比,差异为3.9(-28.2至36.1; P = 0.81)。 3组中在任何时间点均未观察到PRU的显着差异。结论::在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中,将普拉格雷60 mg LD加到氯吡格雷600 mg LD中的血小板反应性与单独普拉格雷60 mg LD相比无明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号