...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Heart failure with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial.
【24h】

Heart failure with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial.

机译:在抗高血压和降脂治疗中预防和预防心律失常伴左心室射血分数降低。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) developing in hypertensive patients may occur with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (PEF [>or=50%] or REF [<50%]). In the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), 42 418 high-risk hypertensive patients were randomized to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin, providing an opportunity to compare these treatments with regard to occurrence of hospitalized HFPEF or HFREF. METHODS AND RESULTS: HF diagnostic criteria were prespecified in the ALLHAT protocol. EF estimated by contrast ventriculography, echocardiography, or radionuclide study was available in 910 of 1367 patients (66.6%) with hospitalized events meeting ALLHAT criteria. Cox regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics were used to examine treatment differences for HF (overall and by PEF and REF). HF case fatality rates were examined. Of those with EF data, 44.4% had HFPEF and 55.6% had HFREF. Chlorthalidone reduced the risk of HFPEF compared with amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin; the hazard ratios were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.91; P=0.009), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97; P=0.032), and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73; P<0.001), respectively. Chlorthalidone reduced the risk of HFREF compared with amlodipine or doxazosin; the hazard ratios were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.94; P=0.013) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.79; P<0.001), respectively. Chlorthalidone was similar to lisinopril with regard to incidence of HFREF (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.40; P=0.596). After HF onset, death occurred in 29.2% of participants (chlorthalidone/amlodipine/lisinopril) with new-onset HFPEF versus 41.9% in those with HFREF (P<0.001; median follow-up, 1.74 years); and in the chlorthalidone/doxazosin comparison that was terminated early, 20.0% of HFPEF and 26.0% of HFREF patients died (P=0.185; median follow-up, 1.55 years). CONCLUSIONS: In ALLHAT, with adjudicated outcomes, chlorthalidone significantly reduced the occurrence of new-onset hospitalized HFPEF and HFREF compared with amlodipine and doxazosin. Chlorthalidone also reduced the incidence of new-onset HFPEF compared with lisinopril. Among high-risk hypertensive men and women, HFPEF has a better prognosis than HFREF.
机译:背景:高血压患者发展为心力衰竭(HF)可能伴有左心室射血分数的保留或降低(PEF [>或= 50%]或REF [<50%])。在预防高血压的降脂和降脂治疗试验(ALLHAT)中,将42418例高危高血压患者随机分配给氯噻酮,氨氯地平,赖诺普利或多沙唑嗪,为比较这些治疗与住院HFPEF发生的机会提供了机会或HFREF。方法和结果:在ALLHAT方案中预先确定了HF的诊断标准。通过心室造影,超声心动图或放射性核素研究评估的EF在1367例符合ALLHAT标准的住院事件中有910例(66.6%)可用。使用针对基线特征进行了调整的Cox回归模型来检查HF的治疗差异(总体以及PEF和REF)。检查HF病例死亡率。在具有EF数据的人群中,有44.4%的患者具有HFPEF,有55.6%的患者具有HFREF。与氨氯地平,赖诺普利或多沙唑嗪相比,氯噻酮降低了HFPEF的风险;危险比为0.69(95%置信区间[CI],0.53至0.91; P = 0.009),0.74(95%CI,0.56至0.97; P = 0.032)和0.53(95%CI,0.38至0.73; P <0.001)。与氨氯地平或多沙唑嗪相比,氯噻酮降低了HFREF的风险;危险比分别为0.74(95%CI,0.59至0.94; P = 0.013)和0.61(95%CI,0.47至0.79; P <0.001)。在HFREF的发生率方面,氯噻酮与莱西普利相似(危险比,1.07; 95%CI,0.82至1.40; P = 0.596)。 HF发作后,新发HFPEF的参与者(氯噻酮/氨氯地平/赖诺普利)发生死亡的比例为29.2%,而HFREF为41.9%(P <0.001;中位随访时间为1。74年)。在较早终止的氯噻酮/多沙唑嗪比较中,有20.0%的HFPEF和26.0%的HFREF患者死亡(P = 0.185;中位随访时间为1.55年)。结论:总的来说,与氨氯地平和多沙唑嗪相比,氯噻酮具有决定性的结果,可显着减少新发住院的HFPEF和HFREF的发生。与赖诺普利相比,氯噻酮还可以减少新发HFPEF的发生。在高危高血压的男性和女性中,HFPEF的预后要好于HFREF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号