...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes >Regional density of cardiologists and rates of mortality for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure
【24h】

Regional density of cardiologists and rates of mortality for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure

机译:心脏病专家的区域密度和急性心肌梗塞和心力衰竭的死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background-Cardiologists are distributed unevenly across regions of the United States. It is unknown whether patients in regions with fewer cardiologists have worse outcomes after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or heart failure (HF). Methods and Results-Using Medicare administrative claims data from 2010, we examined the relationship between regional density of cardiologists and risk of death after hospitalization for AMI and HF using hospitalizations for pneumonia as a comparison. We defined density as the number of cardiologists divided by population aged≥65 years within hospital referral regions, categorized into quintiles. Among 171 126 admissions for AMI, 352 853 admissions for HF, and 343 053 admissions for pneumonia, we tested associations between density of cardiologists and 30-day and 1-year mortality for each condition. We used 2-level hierarchical logistic regression models that adjusted for characteristics of patients and hospital referral regions. Patients hospitalized for AMI (odds ratios [OR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.21) and HF (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.27) in the lowest quintile of density had modestly higher 30-day mortality risk compared with patients in the highest quintile, unlike patients hospitalized for pneumonia (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.09). Patients hospitalized for AMI (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12) and HF (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13) in the lowest quintile had slightly higher 1-year mortality risk, unlike patients hospitalized for pneumonia (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.95-1.05). Conclusions-Patients hospitalized for AMI and HF in regions with a low density of cardiologists experienced modestly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality risk, unlike patients with pneumonia.
机译:背景心脏病专家在美国各地区分布不均。尚不清楚心脏病专家较少的地区患者因急性心肌梗塞(AMI)或心力衰竭(HF)住院后的预后是否更差。方法和结果-使用2010年的Medicare行政索赔数据,我们通过比较肺炎住院情况,检查了心脏病专家的区域密度与AMI和HF住院后死亡风险之间的关系。我们将密度定义为心脏科医师人数除以医院转诊区域内≥65岁的人群,并分为五分位数。在AMI的171 126例入症,HF的352 853例和肺炎的343 053例中,我们测试了每种情况下心脏病专家的密度与30天和1年死亡率之间的关联。我们使用了2级分层Logistic回归模型,该模型针对患者和医院转诊地区的特征进行了调整。在最低密度的五分位数中接受AMI(比值[OR],1.13; 95%置信区间[CI],1.06-1.21)和HF(OR,1.19; 95%CI,1.12-1.27)住院的患者适度较高30与最高的五分位数患者相比,其一日死亡风险与住院肺炎的患者不同(OR为1.02; 95%CI为0.96-1.09)。在最低的五分位数住院的AMI(OR,1.06; 95%CI,1.00-1.12)和HF(OR,1.09; 95%CI,1.04-1.13)住院的患者的1年死亡率风险略高,与肺炎住院的患者不同(OR,1.00; 95%CI,0.95-1.05)。结论:与肺炎患者不同,心脏病专家密度低的地区住院的AMI和HF患者的30天和1年死亡率风险略高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号