首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Remote Sensing >Remote sensing change detection methods to track deforestation and growth in threatened rainforests in Madre de Dios, Peru
【24h】

Remote sensing change detection methods to track deforestation and growth in threatened rainforests in Madre de Dios, Peru

机译:遥感变化检测方法可追踪秘鲁Madre de Dios受威胁雨林的森林砍伐和生长

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two forestry-change detection methods are described, compared, and contrasted for estimating deforestation and growth in threatened forests in southern Peru from 2000 to 2010. The methods used in this study rely on freely available data, including atmospherically corrected Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) vegetation continuous fields (VCF). The two methods include a conventional supervised signature extraction method and a unique self-calibrating method called MODIS VCF guided forest/ nonforest (FNF) masking. The process chain for each of these methods includes a threshold classification of MODIS VCF, training data or signature extraction, signature evaluation, k-nearest neighbor classification, analyst-guided reclassification, and postclassification image differencing to generate forest change maps. Comparisons of all methods were based on an accuracy assessment using 500 validation pixels. Results of this accuracy assessment indicate that FNF masking had a 5% higher overall accuracy and was superior to conventional supervised classification when estimating forest change. Both methods succeeded in classifying persistently forested and nonforested areas, and both had limitations when classifying forest change. (C) 2015 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
机译:描述,比较和对比了两种林业变化检测方法,以估计2000年至2010年秘鲁南部受威胁的森林中的森林砍伐和生长。本研究中使用的方法依赖于免费获得的数据,包括经过大气校正的Landsat 5专题测绘仪和中等分辨率成像光谱辐射仪(MODIS)植被连续场(VCF)。这两种方法包括常规的监督签名提取方法和称为MODIS VCF引导的森林/非森林(FNF)遮罩的独特的自校准方法。这些方法中的每一个的过程链都包括MODIS VCF的阈值分类,训练数据或签名提取,签名评估,k近邻分类,分析员指导的重新分类以及后分类图像差分以生成森林变化图。所有方法的比较均基于使用500个验证像素的准确性评估。这项准确性评估的结果表明,在估算森林变化时,FNF掩蔽的总体准确性提高了5%,并且优于传统的监督分类。两种方法都成功地对森林和非森林区域进行了分类,并且在对森林变化进行分类时都存在局限性。 (C)2015年光电仪器工程师协会(SPIE)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号