首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aquatic Plant Management >Comparison of QuickBird and SPOT 5 Satellite Imagery for Mapping Giant Reed
【24h】

Comparison of QuickBird and SPOT 5 Satellite Imagery for Mapping Giant Reed

机译:比较QuickBird和SPOT 5卫星影像绘制巨型芦苇的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

QuickBird (2.4 m resolution) and SPOT 5 (10 m resolution) multi-spectral satellite imagery were compared for mapping the invasive grass, giant reed (Arundo donax L.), along the Rio Grande in southwest Texas. The imagery had three bands (green, red, and near-infrared). Three subsets from both the QuickBird and SPOT 5 images were extracted and used as study sites. The same subsets were extracted from both images. The images were subjected to supervised image analysis. Accuracy assessments performed onQuick-Bird classification maps from the three sites had producer's and user's accuracies for giant reed that ranged from 92% to 100%. Accuracy assessments performed on SPOT 5 classification maps from the three sites had producer's and user's accuracies for giant reed ranging from 75.7% to 93.3%. The lower accuracies of the SPOT 5 image classifications were attributed to its coarser resolution.
机译:比较了QuickBird(2.4 m分辨率)和SPOT 5(10 m分辨率)多光谱卫星图像,用于绘制德克萨斯州西南沿里奥格兰德州的入侵草,巨型芦苇(Arundo donax L.)。图像具有三个波段(绿色,红色和近红外)。从QuickBird和SPOT 5图像中提取了三个子集,并将其用作研究地点。从两个图像中提取相同的子集。对图像进行监督图像分析。在这三个地点的Quick-Bird分类图上进行的准确性评估,生产者和使用者对巨型芦苇的精确度在92%至100%之间。在三个地点的SPOT 5分类地图上进行的准确性评估,生产者和使用者对巨型芦苇的准确度在75.7%至93.3%之间。 SPOT 5图像分类的较低准确性归因于其较粗糙的分辨率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号