首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of a Centrifugal Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device and Concurrent Cardiac Valve Procedures
【24h】

Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of a Centrifugal Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device and Concurrent Cardiac Valve Procedures

机译:植入左心室辅助流离心流和同时进行心脏瓣膜手术后的临床结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background-Cardiac valve procedures are commonly performed concurrently during implantation of left ventricular assist devices, but the added procedural risk has not been studied in detail.Methods and Results-Data from patients receiving the HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device in the ADVANCE bridge to transplant (BTT) trial and continued access protocol were reviewed. Of 382 consecutive patients who completed follow-up between August 2008 and June 2013 (mean time on support 389 days, median 271 days), 262 (68.6%) underwent isolated HeaitWare Ventricular Assist Device implantation, 75 (19.6%) a concurrent valve procedure, and 45 (11.8%) concurrent nonvalvular procedures. Of the concurrent valve procedures, 56 were tricuspid, 13 aortic, and 6 mitral. Survival was similar between groups (79% for concurrent valve procedures and 85% for HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device only at 1 year; P=0.33). Concurrent valve procedures were also associated with increased unadjusted early right heart failure (RHF). A multivariable analysis for death and RHF (121 total events) identified female sex (odds ratio=2.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.3; P=0.0053]) and preimplant tricuspid regurgitation severity (odds ratio=2.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.8-4.8, P<0.0001]) as independent predictors while concurrent tricuspid valve procedures (TVP) were not predictors. Furthermore, patients with significant preimplant tricuspid regurgitation who did not receive a TVP experienced an increased rate of late RHF compared with those who received TVP (0.19 versus 0.05 events per patient-year, respectively; P=0.024).Conclusions-Compared with HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device alone, survival was equivalent for the concurrent valve procedure group. Tricuspid regurgitation severity was the most important predictor of increased postoperative RHF, and concurrent TVP was not an independent predictor of RHF overall. Concurrent TVP may reduce the rate of late RHF for patients with significant preimplant tricuspid insufficiency.Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00751972.
机译:背景-心脏瓣膜手术通常在植入左心室辅助装置的同时进行,但尚未对增加的手术风险进行详细研究。方法和结果-来自在ADVANCE桥(BTT)中接受HeartWare心室辅助装置的患者的数据)的试用和持续访问协议进行了审核。在2008年8月至2013年6月之间完成随访的382位患者(平均支持时间389天,中位271天)中,有262例(68.6%)接受了单独的HeaitWare心室辅助装置植入,其中75例(19.6%)接受了同时瓣膜手术,以及45个(11.8%)并发非瓣膜手术。在并发瓣膜手术中,三尖瓣56例,主动脉13例,二尖瓣6例。各组之间的生存率相似(仅在一年时,同时进行瓣膜手术的生存率为79%,对于HeartWare心室辅助设备的生存率为85%; P = 0.33)。并发瓣膜手术还与未调整的早期右心衰竭(RHF)增多有关。死亡和RHF(121个事件)的多变量分析确定了女性(几率= 2.0 [95%置信区间,1.2-3.3; P = 0.0053])和植入前三尖瓣关闭不全的严重程度(几率= 2.9 [95%置信区间] (1.8-4.8,P <0.0001])作为独立的预测因子,而同期三尖瓣手术(TVP)则不是预测因子。此外,与未接受TVP的患者相比,未接受TVP的严重的植入前三尖瓣关闭不全的患者发生的晚期RHF发生率增加(每患者年分别为0.19 vs 0.05事件; P = 0.024)。结论-与HeartWare心室相比单独使用Assist Device,生存率与并发瓣膜手术组相当。三尖瓣关闭不全的严重程度是术后RHF升高的最重要预测因素,而同时TVP并不是RHF总体的独立预测因素。同期TVP可能会降低严重的植入前三尖瓣功能不全患者的晚期RHF发生率。临床试验注册网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00751972。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号