...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Geophysics >Determination of permeability index using Stoneley slowness analysis, NMR models, and formation evaluations: a case study from a gas reservoir, south of Iran
【24h】

Determination of permeability index using Stoneley slowness analysis, NMR models, and formation evaluations: a case study from a gas reservoir, south of Iran

机译:使用Stoneley慢度分析,NMR模型和地层评估确定渗透率指数:以伊朗南部一个气藏为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In hydrocarbon reservoirs, permeability is one of the most critical parameters with a significant role in the production of hydrocarbon resources. Direct determination of permeability using Stoneley waves has always had some difficulties. In addition, some un-calibrated empirical models such as Nuclear Magnetic Resonance(NMR) models and petrophysical evaluation model (intrinsic permeability) do not provide reliable estimates of permeability in carbonate formations. Therefore, utilizing an appropriate numericalmethod for direct determination of permeability using Stoneley waves as well as an appropriate calibration method for the empirical models is necessary to have reliable results. This paper shows the application of a numerical method, called bisection method, in the direct determination of permeability from Stoneley wave slowness. In addition, a linear regression (least squares) method was used to calibrate the NMR models including Schlumberger Doll Research (SDR) and Timur-Coates models as well as the intrinsic permeability equation (permeability from petrophysical evaluations). The Express Pressure Tester(XPT) permeability was considered as an option for the reference permeability. Therefore, all permeability models were validated for the Stoneley permeability and calibrated for the empirical models with the XPT permeability. In order to have a quantitative assessment on the results and compare the results before and after the calibration, the RootMean Squares Error (RMSE)was calculated for each of the used models. The results for the Stoneley permeability showed that, inmany points there was not much difference between the Stoneley permeability calculated by the bisection method and the XPT permeability. Comparing the results showed that the calibration of the empirical models reduced their RMSE values. As a result of the calibration, the RMSE was decreased by about 39% for the SDR model, 18% for the Timur-Coates model, and 91% for the petrophysical evaluations model. Presented bisection method calculates permeability directly without of any inversion or external calibration.
机译:在油气藏中,渗透率是最关键的参数之一,在油气资源的生产中起着重要作用。使用斯通利波直接测定渗透率一直存在一些困难。另外,一些未校准的经验模型,例如核磁共振(NMR)模型和岩石物理评估模型(固有渗透率),不能提供碳酸盐岩地层渗透率的可靠估计。因此,为了获得可靠的结果,必须使用适当的数值方法直接使用斯通利波确定渗透率,以及对经验模型采用适当的校准方法。本文展示了一种称为二分法的数值方法在直接根据斯通利波慢度确定渗透率中的应用。此外,线性回归(最小二乘)方法用于校准NMR模型,包括Schlumberger Doll Research(SDR)和Timur-Coates模型以及固有渗透率方程(岩石物理评价中的渗透率)。 Express Pressure Tester(XPT)渗透率被认为是参考渗透率的一种选择。因此,所有渗透率模型均已针对Stoneley渗透率进行了验证,并针对具有XPT渗透率的经验模型进行了校准。为了对结果进行定量评估并比较校准前后的结果,针对每个使用的模型计算了均方根误差(RMSE)。斯通利渗透率的结果表明,在两分法计算得到的斯通利渗透率和XPT渗透率之间,在许多点上没有太大差异。比较结果表明,经验模型的校准降低了它们的RMSE值。校准的结果是,SDR模型的RMSE降低了约39%,Timur-Coates模型的RMSE降低了18%,而岩石物理评估模型的RMSE降低了91%。提出的二等分法可以直接计算渗透率,而无需任何反演或外部校准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号