...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied physiology >Wide-pulse-high-frequency neuromuscular stimulation of triceps surae induces greater muscle fatigue compared with conventional stimulation
【24h】

Wide-pulse-high-frequency neuromuscular stimulation of triceps surae induces greater muscle fatigue compared with conventional stimulation

机译:与常规刺激相比,肱三头肌的宽脉冲高频神经肌肉刺激引起更大的肌肉疲劳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We compared the extent and origin of muscle fatigue induced by short-pulse-low-frequency [conventional (CONV)] and wide-pulse-high-frequency (WPHF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation. We expected CONV contractions to mainly originate from depolarization of axonal terminal branches (spatially determined muscle fiber recruitment) and WPHF contractions to be partly produced via a central pathway (motor unit recruitment according to size principle). Greater neuromuscular fatigue was, therefore, expected following CONV compared with WPHF. Fourteen healthy subjects underwent 20 WPHF (1 ms-100 Hz) and CONV (50 (xs-25 Hz) evoked isometric triceps surae contractions (work/rest periods 20:40 s) at an initial target of 10% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force. Force-time integral of the 20 evoked contractions (FTI) was used as main index of muscle fatigue; MVC force loss was also quantified. Central and peripheral fatigue were assessed by voluntary activation level and paired stimulation amplitudes, respectively. FTI in WPHF was significantly lower than in CONV (21,717 +- 11,541 vs. 37,958 +- 9,898 N-s P<0,001). The reductions in MVC force (WPHF: -7.0 +- 2.7%; CONV: -6.2 +- 2.5%; P < 0.01) and paired stimulation amplitude (WPHF: -8.0 +- 4.0%; CONV: -7.4 +- 6.1%; P < 0.001) were similar between conditions, whereas no change was observed for voluntary activation level {P > 0.05). Overall, our results showed a different motor unit recruitment pattern between the two neuromuscular electrical stimulation modalities with a lower FTI indicating greater muscle fatigue for WPHF, possibly limiting the presumed benefits for rehabilitation programs.
机译:我们比较了短脉冲低频[常规(CONV)]和宽脉冲高频(WPHF)神经肌肉电刺激引起的肌肉疲劳的程度和起源。我们预期CONV收缩主要来自轴突末端分支的去极化(空间确定的肌纤维募集),而WPHF收缩将部分通过中央途径产生(根据大小原理运动单元募集)。因此,与WPHF相比,预计CONV后会出现更大的神经肌肉疲劳。 14名健康受试者经历了20 WPHF(1 ms-100 Hz)和CONV(50(xs-25 Hz)诱发等轴肱三头肌腓肠肌收缩(工作/休息时间20:40 s),初始目标是最大自愿收缩的10%( MVC)力:将20个诱发的收缩(FTI)的力时积分用作肌肉疲劳的主要指标;还量化了MVC力的损失;分别通过自愿激活水平和成对的刺激幅度评估中枢和周围疲劳。 WPHF中的MVC力降低(WPHF:-7.0 +-2.7%; CONV:-6.2 +-2.5%; P <0.01)和成对的刺激幅度(WPHF:-8.0 +-4.0%; CONV:-7.4 +-6.1%; P <0.001)在两个条件之间相似,而自发激活水平没有变化(P> 0.05)。总体而言,我们的结果显示两种神经肌肉电刺激方式之间的运动单位募集模式不同,FTI较低表明WPHF的肌肉疲劳较大,可能限制了康复计划的预期收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号