首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions >Impact of femoral vascular closure devices and antithrombotic therapy on access site bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial.
【24h】

Impact of femoral vascular closure devices and antithrombotic therapy on access site bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial.

机译:股动脉血管闭合装置和抗血栓治疗对急性冠脉综合征进入部位出血的影响:急性导管插入和紧急干预分类策略(ACUITY)试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial demonstrated that bivalirudin monotherapy significantly reduces major bleeding compared with heparin (unfractionated or enoxaparin) or bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in acute coronary syndromes. Whether vascular closure devices (VCD) impact these results is unknown. Therefore, this study sought to determine whether VCD impact major access site bleeding (ASB) in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early invasive management by the femoral approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: Major ASB in ACUITY was defined as ASB requiring interventional or surgical correction, hematoma > or =5 cm at the access site, retroperitoneal bleeding, or hemoglobin drop > or =3 g/dL with ecchymosis or hematoma <5 cm, oozing blood, or prolonged bleeding (>30 minutes) at the access site. Stepwise logistical regression was performed to identify the independent determinants of ASB. Of 11 621 patients undergoing angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention by the femoral approach, 4307 (37.1%) received a VCD and 7314 (62.9%) did not. Rates of major ASB were lower with VCD compared with no VCD (2.5% versus 3.3%, relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94; P=0.01) and were lowest in patients treated with bivalirudin monotherapy and a VCD (0.7%). Stepwise logistic regression revealed that a VCD (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04) and bivalirudin monotherapy (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.49; P<0.0001) were both independent determinates of freedom from major ASB. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing an early invasive management strategy by the femoral approach, the use of a VCD, bivalirudin monotherapy, or both minimizes rates of major ASB. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00093158.
机译:背景:急性导管插入和紧急干预分类策略(ACUITY)试验表明,比伐卢定单药治疗在急性冠脉综合征中与肝素(未分级或依诺肝素)或比伐卢定加糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂相比,可显着减少严重出血。血管闭合装置(VCD)是否会影响这些结果尚不清楚。因此,本研究试图确定VCD是否影响通过股骨入路接受早期侵入性治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的主要进入部位出血(ASB)。方法和结果:ACUITY的主要ASB定义为需要介入或手术矫正的ASB,进入部位血肿>或= 5 cm,腹膜后出血或血红蛋白下降>或= 3 g / dL,伴瘀斑或血肿<5 cm,进入部位渗血或长时间出血(> 30分钟)。进行逐步Logistic回归以识别ASB的独立决定因素。在11621例接受或不接受经股动脉途径经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的血管造影患者中,有4307例(37.1%)接受了VCD,而7314例(62.9%)未接受VCD。与没有VCD相比,VCD的主要ASB发生率较低(2.5%比3.3%,相对危险度,0.76; 95%CI,0.61至0.94; P = 0.01),比伐卢定单药和VCD治疗的患者最低(0.7 %)。逐步logistic回归分析显示VCD(赔率,0.78; 95%CI,0.61至0.99; P = 0.04)和bivalirudin单药治疗(赔率,0.35; 95%CI,0.25至0.49; P <0.0001)都是独立确定的摆脱主要ASB的束缚。结论:在通过股骨入路接受早期侵入性治疗策略的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,使用VCD,比伐卢定单药或同时使用这两种方法可以最大程度地降低主要ASB的发生率。临床试验注册-URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00093158。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号