...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anxiety disorders >The Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom (OCS) scale of the Child Behavior Checklist: A comparison between Swedish children with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from a specialized unit, regular outpatients and a school sample
【24h】

The Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom (OCS) scale of the Child Behavior Checklist: A comparison between Swedish children with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from a specialized unit, regular outpatients and a school sample

机译:儿童行为清单的强迫症症状(OCS)量表:来自专门机构的瑞典强迫症儿童,常规门诊病人和学校样本之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To evaluate the discriminative power of various items as reported by parents in the OCS-scale extracted from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) problem scale and to compare findings with outcomes of previous validation studies.Children referred to a specialized child psychiatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) clinic (OCD group) (n = 185) receiving a formal OCD diagnosis according to DSM IV criteria based on interviews with the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) were compared to a sample recruited from regular child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics (CPO group) in = 177). Both samples were compared to a normative school sample (SS group) and all three groups were matched for age and gender.Thirty seven CBCL items, mostly representing core internalizing symptoms and parts of the thought problem scale as well as physical and sleep problems, were first identified. Ten of these items (including all discriminative items in previous validation studies) could distinguish children with OCD from CPO patients. In a subsequent analysis, the results of a logistic regression showed that four CBCL items, "Obsessions," "Fearful and Anxious," "Compulsions," and "Worries" remained significant predictors. These four OCS items and previously used CBCL OCS-scales were further examined by means of ROC-analysis showing that the "Obsessions" and "Compulsions" CBCL items were the strongest predictors.These two CBCL items performed well as screens for OCS symptoms in children and adolescents and the addition of similar CBCL items did not further increase sensitivity or specificity. It is suggested that parental responses on these two items could preferably be used as screen for OCD in children and adolescents in regular child psychiatric clinics.
机译:为了评估父母从儿童行为清单(CBCL)问题量表中提取的OCS量表中各项报告的判别力,并将调查结果与先前的验证研究结果进行比较。儿童被称为特殊的儿童精神病性强迫症(OCD)诊所(OCD组)(n = 185)根据DSM IV标准接受了基于儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(CY-BOCS)的访谈的正式OCD诊断,并将其与从正常儿童招募的样本中进行了比较和青少年精神科门诊(CPO组)= 177)。将这两个样本与一个规范的学校样本(SS组)进行比较,并对所有三个组的年龄和性别进行匹配.37份CBCL项分别代表了核心内在症状和部分思想问题量表以及身体和睡眠问题首先确定。这些项目中的十项(包括以前的验证研究中的所有歧视性项目)可以将OCD儿童与CPO患者区分开。在随后的分析中,逻辑回归的结果表明,CBCL的四个项目,“沉迷”,“恐惧与焦虑”,“强迫”和“担忧”仍然是重要的预测指标。通过ROC分析进一步检查了这四个OCS项目和以前使用的CBCL OCS量表,显示“强迫”和“强迫” CBCL项目是最强的预测指标。这两个CBCL项目在筛查儿童OCS症状方面表现良好。青少年,添加类似的CBCL项目并没有进一步提高敏感性或特异性。建议在常规儿童精神病诊所中,父母对这两项的反应可优选用作儿童和青少年的强迫症筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号