...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging >Quantification of chronic functional mitral regurgitation by automated 3-dimensional peak and integrated proximal isovelocity surface area and stroke volume techniques using real-time 3-dimensional volume color Doppler echocardiography: in vitro and clinical validation.
【24h】

Quantification of chronic functional mitral regurgitation by automated 3-dimensional peak and integrated proximal isovelocity surface area and stroke volume techniques using real-time 3-dimensional volume color Doppler echocardiography: in vitro and clinical validation.

机译:使用实时3维体积彩色多普勒超声心动图通过自动3维峰和集成的近端等速表面积和中风体积技术对慢性功能性二尖瓣反流进行定量:体外和临床验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of an automated 3-dimensional (3D) proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) (in vitro and patients) and stroke volume technique (patients) to assess mitral regurgitation (MR) severity using real-time volume color flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography.Using an in vitro model of MR, the effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant volume (RVol) were measured by the PISA technique using 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D (automated true 3D PISA) transthoracic echocardiography. The mean anatomic regurgitant orifice area (0.35±0.10 cm(2)) was underestimated to a greater degree by the 2D (0.12±0.05 cm(2)) than the 3D method (0.25±0.10 cm(2); P<0.001 for both). Compared with the flowmeter (40±14 mL), the RVol by 2D PISA (20±19 mL) was underestimated (P<0.001), but the 3D peak (43±16 mL) and integrated PISA-based (38±14 mL) RVol were comparable (P>0.05 for both). In patients (n=30, functional MR), 3D effective regurgitant orifice area correlated well with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging RVol r=0.84 and regurgitant fraction r=0.80. Compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging RVol (33±22 mL), the integrated PISA RVol (34±26 mL; P=0.42) was not significantly different; however, the peak PISA RVol was higher (48±27 mL; P<0.001). In addition, RVol calculated as the difference in automated mitral and aortic stroke volumes by real-time 3D volume color flow Doppler echocardiography was not significantly different from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (34±21 versus 33±22 mL; P=0.33).Automated real-time 3D volume color flow Doppler based 3D PISA is more accurate than the 2D PISA method to quantify MR. In patients with functional MR, the 3D RVol by integrated PISA is more accurate than a peak PISA technique. Automated 3D stroke volume measurement can also be used as an adjunctive method to quantify MR severity.
机译:这项研究的目的是为了测试自动3维(3D)近端等速表面积(PISA)(体外和患者)和中风量技术(患者)的准确性,以评估二尖瓣反流(MR)的严重程度,时间体积彩色流多普勒经胸超声心动图。使用MR体外模型,通过PISA技术使用二维(2D)和3D(自动真实3D PISA)经胸超声心动图测量有效的返流孔面积和返流体积(RVol)。 。 2D(0.12±0.05 cm(2))比3D方法(0.25±0.10 cm(2))更大程度地低估了平均解剖返流孔面积(0.35±0.10 cm(2)),对于P <0.001都)。与流量计(40±14 mL)相比,2D PISA(20±19 mL)的RVol被低估(P <0.001),但3D峰(43±16 mL)和基于PISA的积分(38±14 mL)被低估了)RVol是可比较的(两者P均> 0.05)。在患者(n = 30,功能性MR)中,有效的3D反流口面积与心脏磁共振成像RVol r = 0.84和反流分数r = 0.80密切相关。与心脏磁共振成像RVol(33±22 mL)相比,积分PISA RVol(34±26 mL; P = 0.42)没有显着差异。然而,峰值PISA RVol较高(48±27 mL; P <0.001)。此外,通过实时3D体积彩色血流多普勒超声心动图计算的自动二尖瓣和主动脉搏动量之差的RVol与心脏磁共振成像无显着差异(34±21 vs 33±22 mL; P = 0.33)。基于实时3D体积彩色流多普勒的3D PISA比2D PISA方法更准确地量化MR。在功能性MR患者中,通过集成PISA进行的3D RVol比峰值PISA技术更准确。自动化3D搏动量测量也可以用作量化MR严重性的辅助方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号