...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Communications >Counting Room Voices in the Farm Publisher-Reader-Advertiser Triad
【24h】

Counting Room Voices in the Farm Publisher-Reader-Advertiser Triad

机译:计算Farm Publisher-Reader-Advertiser Triad中的房间声音

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study is part of a series that examines changing power relationships among commercial farm periodicals, their readers, and advertisers. The series focuses upon the health, vigor, and credibility of a complex information system in which the U.S. food enterprise and society in general have an important stake. Authors employed a "contractualist model" in which power requires mutual agreement by all parties. Two previous studies in the series identified concerns of farm periodical journalists and readers about advertiser-related pressures on editorial content. Through qualitative research methods, the study reported here examined related views among a sample of agricultural publishers and advertisers. Both groups expressed the most concern about the consolidation taking place among producers, marketers, and publishers, but they focused on different sectors. All three kinds of consolidation have the effect of giving the advertiser more power within the triad. Publishers and advertisers emphasized the need to maintain editorial credibility of commercial farm periodicals, acknowledged advertiser-related pressures, but shared a feeling that such pressures can be controlled and should not influence the independent stance of editorial content. They differed somewhat, however, in views on managing the editorial-advertising "wall." Publishers also identified ways in which they are adapting, through diversification, to changing strategies of advertisers in an era of consolidation and new information technologies. By revealing perspectives of all partners in the triad, findings provide a useful staging point for interactions and understandings.
机译:该研究是研究商业农场期刊,其读者和广告商之间不断变化的权力关系的系列文章的一部分。该系列着重于复杂的信息系统的健康,活力和信誉,在该系统中,美国食品企业和整个社会都在其中扮演着重要的角色。作者采用了一种“合同制模式”,在这种模式中,权力要求各方共同同意。该系列中的前两项研究确定了农场期刊记者和读者对与广告商有关的社论内容压力的担忧。通过定性研究方法,此处报道的研究检查了农业出版商和广告商样本中的相关观点。两组都对生产商,营销商和出版商之间的合并表示最担忧,但他们关注的是不同领域。所有这三种合并都有使广告商在三合会中拥有更大权力的效果。出版商和广告商强调必须保持商业农场期刊的编辑信誉,承认与广告商有关的压力,但他们共同认为,这种压力可以控制,不应影响编辑内容的独立立场。但是,他们在管理社论广告“墙”方面的看法有所不同。在整合和新信息技术时代,出版商还确定了通过多元化适应广告客户不断变化的战略的方式。通过揭示三合会中所有合作伙伴的观点,研究结果为互动和理解提供了有用的切入点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号