首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agrarian Change >Environment and Citizenship in Latin America: Natures, Subjects, and Struggles
【24h】

Environment and Citizenship in Latin America: Natures, Subjects, and Struggles

机译:拉丁美洲的环境与公民身份:自然,主题与斗争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Alex Latta and Hannah Wittman have put together an excellent volume that makes a valuable contribution to the literature in political ecology. Political ecology places nature at the centre of analysis, with an explicit focus on struggles over its exploitation. It asks how development affects environmental sustainability and who bene?ts from it, who is hurt and why. Because of this focus, political ecology is vitally interested in the democratization of environmental politics to include the interests of populations who are generally the victims of progress. Latta, Whittman and collaborators engage these themes through the lens of citizenship. Their effort sheds much-needed light on two key questions. How can we more adequately specify the concept of environmental citizenship? What conditions facilitate the expansion of environmental citizenship to social groups that are traditionally excluded from decisionmaking and on the losing end of development projects? The cases mostly focus on rural areas and subaltern social groups that call them home; thus, Latta and Wittman’s collection of essays places the subject of environmental citizenship front and centre in debates about agrarian change.
机译:亚历克斯·拉塔(Alex Latta)和汉娜·威特曼(Hannah Wittman)合编的著作非常丰富,为政治生态学文学做出了宝贵贡献。政治生态把自然置于分析的中心,明确地关注于对自然开发的斗争。它询问发展如何影响环境的可持续性,谁从中受益,谁受到伤害,为什么。由于这种关注,政治生态学对环境政治的民主化非常感兴趣,以包括通常是进步的受害者的人民的利益。拉塔(Latta),惠特曼(Whittman)和合作者通过公民身份来参与这些主题。他们的努力为两个关键问题提供了急需的启示。我们如何才能更充分地说明环境公民的概念?哪些条件有利于将环境公民权扩大到传统上不参与决策和发展项目失败的社会群体?这些案件主要集中在农村地区和称自己为家的次要社会群体。因此,拉塔(Latta)和威特曼(Wittman)的论文集将环境公民权的主题放在有关农业变化的辩论的前沿和中心位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号