...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging studies >'Careworkers don't have a voice:' Epistemological violence in residential care for older people
【24h】

'Careworkers don't have a voice:' Epistemological violence in residential care for older people

机译:“护理人员没有声音:”老年人居住护理中的认识论暴力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Drawing on feminist epistemologies, this paper attends to the way the reductionist assumptions have shaped the organization of nursing home carework in manners that are insufficient to the needs of relational care. This paper is informed by a study involving nine focus groups and a survey of Canadian residential care workers (141 RNs, 139 LPNs and 415 frontline careworkers). Four major themes were identified. Reductionist assumptions contributed to routinized, task-based approaches to care, resulting in what careworkers termed "assembly line care." Insufficient time and emphasis on the relational dimensions of care made it difficult to "treat residents as human beings." Accountability, enacted as counting and documenting, led to an "avalanche of paperwork" that took time away from care. Finally, hierarchies of knowledge contributed to systemic exclusions and the perception that "careworkers' don't have a voice." Careworkers reported distress as a result of the tensions between the organization of work and the needs of relational care. We theorize these findings as examples of "epistemological violence," a concept coined by Vandana Shiva (1988) to name the harm that results from the hegemony of reductionist assumptions. While not acting alone, we argue that reductionism has played an important role in shaping the context of care both at a policy and organizational level, and it continues to shape the solutions to problems in nursing home care in ways that pose challenges for careworkers. We conclude by suggesting that improving the quality of both work and care will require respecting the specificities of care and its unique epistemological and ontological nature. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文利用女性主义的认识论,探讨了还原主义的假设以不足以满足关系护理需求的方式塑造了养老院护理工作的组织方式。本文是根据一项涉及9个焦点小组的研究以及对加拿大居住护理人员(141名注册护士,139名LPN和415名一线护理人员)的调查而得出的。确定了四个主要主题。还原主义者的假设促成了常规的,基于任务的护理方法,从而导致护理人员称之为“装配线护理”。时间不足和对护理的关系维度的重视使得难以“将居民作为人类进行治疗”。问责制是计数和记录在案的法律,导致“文书工作雪崩”,这使护理工作花费了很多时间。最后,知识等级有助于系统的排除和“护理人员没有发言权”的观念。由于工作安排和关系护理需求之间的紧张关系,护理人员报告感到困扰。我们将这些发现理论化为“认识论上的暴力”的例子,范丹娜·希瓦(Vandana Shiva,1988)提出了这个概念,以命名归因于还原论假设的危害。尽管不是一个人行动,但我们认为还原主义在政策和组织层面上都在塑造护理环境方面发挥了重要作用,并且继续以对护理人员构成挑战的方式来塑造护理院护理问题的解决方案。我们的结论是,建议提高工作和护理质量将需要尊重护理的特殊性及其独特的认识论和本体论性质。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号