首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agrarian Change >The Agrarian Question in a Maoist Guerrilla Zone: Land, Labour and Capital in the Forests and Hills of Jharkhand, India
【24h】

The Agrarian Question in a Maoist Guerrilla Zone: Land, Labour and Capital in the Forests and Hills of Jharkhand, India

机译:毛主义游击区的土地问题:印度贾坎德邦森林和丘陵中的土地,劳动力和资本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As an object of ethnographic enquiry, this paper explores the significance of the modes of production debates for the radical Left in India. Its aim is modest: to investigate whether the analysis of the Indian economy by the underground Communist Party of India (Maoist), or the Naxalites, maps on to agrarian transformations in the heart of their revolutionary struggle, in one of their guerrilla zones in fharkhand. The Maoist concern with the agrarian question is shown to be first and foremost an issue of politics, determining their strategy and tactics; the question of identifying who is the 'enemy', who to form alliances with and how to progress the struggle. A principal contradiction is established by the Maoists as being that between feudalism and the masses. Analysing the political economy of the hills and forests of fharkhand, this paper reveals first how feudal relations were not established there. Second, it shows the persistence of non-capitalist relations of production in farming. And, third, it illuminates the emergence of class differentiation through processes that bypass the development of capitalism in agriculture. The argument is that it is the modern state itself that has played a crucial role in these slow processes of class differentiation in the Adivasi-dominated hills and forests of India. Analysing the agrarian transition in this guerrilla zone, this paper offers a critical analysis of Maoist strategy and tactics.
机译:作为人种学研究的对象,本文探讨了生产方式辩论对印度激进左派的重要性。它的目的是适度的:调查地下印度共产党(毛主义)或纳萨尔主义者对印度经济的分析是否在革命斗争的中心地带,在法坎德邦的游击区之一中进行了农业转型。 。毛派对土地问题的关注被证明是首要的政治问题,决定了他们的战略和策略。确定谁是“敌人”,与谁结盟以及如何进行斗争的问题。毛派建立的主要矛盾是封建主义与群众之间的矛盾。通过分析法坎德山丘和森林的政治经济,本文首先揭示了封建关系是如何在那儿不建立的。其次,它表明了农业中非资本主义生产关系的持续存在。第三,它通过绕过农业资本主义发展的过程阐明了阶级分化的出现。有论点认为,正是现代国家本身在印度的阿瓦帕西(Adivasi)统治的丘陵和森林中,在阶级分化的缓慢过程中发挥了关键作用。分析了该游击区的农业转型,本文对毛主义的策略和策略进行了批判性分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号