...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging studies >Social rights and employment rights related to family care: Family care regimes in Europe
【24h】

Social rights and employment rights related to family care: Family care regimes in Europe

机译:与家庭护理有关的社会权利和就业权利:欧洲的家庭护理制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In early welfare states, social rights predominantly derived from formal employment relations. Within the past two decades, however, some European countries have opened these social institutions to care work also. Cash-for-care and social entitlements for periods of at-home family caregiving have changed the characteristics of informal care work that family members traditionally provide to older relatives. Formerly based on unpaid kinship relations, it has changed towards new paid and more formalized forms of care work by family members. But it can be assumed that long-term care work by family members is constructed differently across welfare states.The paper is guided by the following research question: How do welfare-state policies differ in the degree to which their policies towards family care for senior citizens create social risks for the caring family members? We use the conceptual framework of "family care regimes" as our analytical framework for the comparative research.To do this, we compare care policies towards older care-needy people in the welfare states of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. The findings show that a common feature in all three countries is that the situation of family carers is to some degree being formalized: in all three countries a frail senior citizen can chose a family member as the care provider, and the welfare states support the family care providers. Still, the legal situation as well as the quality and level of social rights for family caregivers differ considerably among the three countries. It is shown that the institutional framework for senior care by family members in Germany and the Netherlands represents a family care regime that supports semi-formal family care, and that in Denmark it can be classified as a family care regime that supports formal family care. We show that these different types of family care regimes differ considerably in the social risks they pose to family carers.
机译:在早期福利国家,社会权利主要来自正式的雇佣关系。然而,在过去的二十年中,一些欧洲国家也开放了这些社会机构来照料工作。在家中家庭照料期间的现金支付和社会福利改变了家庭成员传统上向老年亲戚提供的非正式照料工作的特征。它以前是基于无偿亲属关系,现在已经转变为家庭成员采用新的有偿和正规化的护理工作形式。但是,可以假设,在福利国家之间,家庭成员的长期照护工作的结构是不同的。本文以以下研究问题为指导:福利国家政策在老年人的家庭照料政策方面有何不同?公民为有爱心的家庭成员带来社会风险?我们使用“家庭照料制度”的概念框架作为我们进行比较研究的分析框架。为此,我们比较了荷兰,德国和丹麦福利州针对年长照料者的照料政策。调查结果表明,这三个国家的共同特点是家庭照顾者的状况在某种程度上已经正规化:在这三个国家中,体弱的老年人可以选择一名家庭成员作为照料提供者,而福利国家则支持该家庭。护理人员。尽管如此,这三个国家的家庭照顾者的法律状况以及社会权利的质量和水平仍然存在很大差异。结果表明,德国和荷兰的家庭成员提供高级照料的体制框架代表了一种支持半正式家庭照护的家庭照护制度,在丹麦,可以将其归类为支持正式家庭照护的家庭照护制度。我们表明,这些不同类型的家庭护理制度在其对家庭护理人员构成的社会风险方面存在很大差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号