...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions >Bleeding risk comparing targeted low-dose heparin with bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a propensity score-matched analysis of the evaluation of drug-eluting stents and ischemic events (EVENT) registry
【24h】

Bleeding risk comparing targeted low-dose heparin with bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a propensity score-matched analysis of the evaluation of drug-eluting stents and ischemic events (EVENT) registry

机译:在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中比较靶向低剂量肝素和比伐卢定的出血风险:药物洗脱支架和缺血事件(EVENT)登记评估的倾向得分匹配分析结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background-Prior randomized trials have shown reduced bleeding with bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it is not known if this benefit is also present when UFH doses are more tightly controlled (as measured by activated clotting time, ACT). Methods and Results-Patients enrolled in the EVENT (Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) registry, were divided into 3 groups, based on the antithrombotic drug used during PCI (UFH monotherapy, UFH+glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitor [GPI], or bivalirudin alone). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for measured covariates (89 variables) and to compare bivalirudin versus UFH monotherapy and bivalirudin versus UFH+GPI groups. The UFH groups were stratified based on ACT achieved (optimal ACT defined as 250-300 for UFH monotherapy and 200-250 when GPI was also used). The primary bleeding outcome was in-hospital composite bleeding, defined as events of access site bleeding, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major/minor bleeding, or transfusion. Primary (in-hospital death/myocardial infarction) and secondary ischemic outcomes (death/MI/unplanned repeat revascularization at 12 months) were also evaluated. Propensity score matching yielded 3022 patients for the UFH monotherapy versus bivalirudin comparison and 3520 patients for the UFH+GPI versus bivalirudin comparison. Bivalirudin use was associated with numerically lower bleeding rates at all categories of achieved ACT when compared with UFH (low, optimal, high ACT: 2.5% versus 4.7%, 1.9% versus 6.0%, 3.1% versus 4.8%, respectively) or heparin+GPI groups (low, optimal, high ACT: 0.0% versus 2.7%, 2.7% versus 5.2%, 2.4% versus 6.1%, respectively) and was not associated with any statistically significant increase in either primary or secondary ischemic outcomes. Conclusions-Among unselected patients undergoing PCI, bivalirudin use during PCI was associated with a lower risk of bleeding at all comparator ACT levels without an increase in ischemic outcomes.
机译:背景-之前的随机试验显示,比伐他汀肝素(UFH)相比,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者使用比伐卢定可以减少出血。但是,尚不知道当更严格地控​​制UFH剂量时(通过活化凝血时间ACT进行测量)是否也存在这种益处。方法和结果:根据PCI期间使用的抗血栓药物(UFH单一疗法,UFH +糖蛋白IIb-IIIa受体抑制剂[GPI]),将参加EVENT(药物洗脱支架和缺血事件评估)注册的患者分为3组。 ]或单独的比伐卢定)。倾向得分匹配用于调整测量的协变量(89个变量),并比较比伐卢定和UFH单药治疗和比伐卢定和UFH + GPI组的比较。 UFH组根据达到的ACT进行分层(最佳ACT定义为UFH单药治疗为250-300,使用GPI时为200-250)。主要出血结果为院内复合出血,定义为进入部位出血,心肌梗塞溶栓发生大/小出血或输血。还评估了原发性(医院内死亡/心肌梗塞)和继发性缺血结局(死亡/ MI / 12个月计划外重复血运重建)。倾向得分匹配得出,UFH单药治疗与比伐卢定比较的结果为3022例,UFH + GPI与比伐卢定比较的结果为3520例。与UFH(低,最佳,高ACT:分别为2.5%对4.7%,1.9%对6.0%,3.1%对4.8%)或肝素+相比,使用比伐卢定在所有类别的ACT上的出血率在数值上均较低GPI组(低,最佳,高ACT:分别为0.0%对2.7%,2.7%对5.2%,2.4%对6.1%),与原发性或继发性缺血结局的任何统计学显着性增加均无关。结论-在未选择PCI的患者中,PCI期间使用比伐卢定在所有比较者ACT水平下出血风险较低,而缺血结果却没有增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号