首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Education >Conflicts of Time: Examining School Schedules inSecondary Agricultural Programs
【24h】

Conflicts of Time: Examining School Schedules inSecondary Agricultural Programs

机译:时间冲突:检查中学农业计划中的学校时间表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine how school schedules can or cannot be justifiedthrough the perspective of student performance on state core content assessments andoccupational skills standards assessments. This study utilized the Theory of Power in Educationwhen considering school schedules as a means to student success on core content andoccupational skills assessment. The population of this study consisted of secondary agriculturalprograms (n = 136) across the state of Kentucky. The survey revealed the majority of secondaryagricultural programs work on a seven-period day. Secondary agricultural programs receivedthe highest pass rate on the production livestock occupational skill standards assessment. Themajority of students received a passing score on the state mandated assessment area of readingno matter the schedule. Less than half of agricultural students received passing scores in Math,Science, and Social Studies. Trimester schedules had the lowest pass rate in the areas of Reading,Science, Social Studies, and Writing while only outperforming 4x4 block in Math byone percentile.
机译:这项研究的目的是通过学生对州核心内容评估和职业技能标准评估的表现来检验学校时间表是否合理。这项研究在考虑上课日程的同时,利用教育中的权力理论作为学生成功完成核心内容和职业技能评估的一种手段。这项研究的人口包括肯塔基州的次要农业计划(n = 136)。调查显示,大多数二级农业计划在7天的时间内完成工作。二级农业计划在生产牲畜职业技能标准评估中获得最高通过率。无论时间表如何,绝大多数学生在国家规定的阅读评估领域都获得及格分数。不到一半的农业学生在数学,科学和社会研究中获得及格分数。在阅读,科学,社会研究和写作领域,三个学期的考试通过率最低,而数学中的4x4成绩仅高出一个百分点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号