首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Heart failure >Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the risk of cardiac events in patients with diabetes enrolled in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT).
【24h】

Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the risk of cardiac events in patients with diabetes enrolled in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT).

机译:心脏再同步治疗降低了参加心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)的多中心自动除颤器植入试验的糖尿病患者发生心脏事件的风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding whether the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) influences the benefit of cardiac resynchronization with defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) in heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effect of CRT-D was evaluated in 1817 patients who were enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Patients were minimally symptomatic (New York Heart Association class I or II), with ejection fraction /=130 ms. We used Cox regression to determine hazard ratio (HR) of CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for the risk of HF event or death, whichever came first (MADIT-CRT primary end point), in DM (n=552) and non-DM (n=1265) patients. Compared with the non-DM patients, those with DM had more coronary risk factors. During an average follow-up of 2.4 years, DM patients had significantly more primary end point events than non-DM patients (26.6% versus 18%, P<0.001). CRT-D was associated with a significant reduction in risk of primary end point in both DM (HR=0.56, P<0.001) and non-DM patients (HR=0.67, P=0.003). Compared with non-DM patients, CRT-D:ICD HRs in DM patients were lower in the total population, and in subgroups with ischemic cardiomyopathy (0.63 versus 0.64), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (0.39 versus 0.73), and left bundle-branch block (0.36 versus 0.50). There were no significant differences in ventricular remodeling, arrhythmia events, or device-related complications between DM and non-DM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes, left ventricular dysfunction, mildly symptomatic HF, and wide QRS complex derive similar benefit from CRT-D compared with patients without diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.
机译:背景:关于心力衰竭(HF)患者中糖尿病(DM)的存在是否会影响除颤器治疗(CRT-D)心脏再同步的益处的数据有限。方法和结果:对1817例接受心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)的多中心自动除颤器植入试验的患者进行了CRT-D疗效评估。患者症状轻微(纽约心脏协会I级或II级),射血分数 / = 130 ms。我们使用Cox回归确定DM中HF事件或死亡风险的CRT-D与植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗的风险比(HR),以先到者为准(MADIT-CRT主要终点),以DM(n = 552)和非糖尿病(n = 1265)患者。与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者有更多的冠心病危险因素。在平均2.4年的随访期间,DM患者的主要终点事件明显多于非DM患者(26.6%对18%,P <0.001)。 CRT-D与DM(HR = 0.56,P <0.001)和非DM患者(HR = 0.67,P = 0.003)的主要终点风险显着降低相关。与非DM患者相比,DM患者的CRT-D:ICD HRs在总人群中较低,在缺血性心肌病(0.63 vs 0.64),非缺血性心肌病(0.39 vs 0.73)和左束支传导阻滞( 0.36比0.50)。 DM和非DM患者之间的心室重构,心律失常事件或与设备相关的并发症均无显着差异。结论:与没有糖尿病的患者相比,患有CRT-D的糖尿病,左心功能不全,轻度症状性HF和宽QRS波群患者获得了相似的获益。临床试验注册:URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00180271。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号