首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Heart failure >Long-Term Results of Intensified, N-Terminal-Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide–Guided Versus Symptom-Guided Treatment in Elderly Patients With Heart Failure Five-Year Follow-Up From TIME-CHF
【24h】

Long-Term Results of Intensified, N-Terminal-Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide–Guided Versus Symptom-Guided Treatment in Elderly Patients With Heart Failure Five-Year Follow-Up From TIME-CHF

机译:TIME-CHF随访五年的心衰老年患者的强化N肽-钠促尿钠肽引导与症状引导治疗的长期结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background—Therapy guided by N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels may improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), especially in younger patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. It remains unclear whether treatment effects persist after discontinuation of the NT-proBNP–guided treatment strategy. Methods and Results—Trial of Intensified versus standard Medical therapy in Elderly patients with Congestive Heart Failure randomized 499 patients with HF aged ≥60 years with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% to intensified, NT-proBNP–guided versus standard, symptom-guided therapy into prespecified age groups (60–74 and ≥75 years) during 18 months. A total of 329 patients (92%) alive at 18 months agreed to long-term follow-up. HF medication was intensified to a larger extent in the NT-proBNP–guided group. During long-term, NT-proBNP–guided therapy did not improve hospital-free (primary end point: hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.06; P=0.16) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.13; P=0.25) but did improve HF hospitalization-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.90; P=0.005). Patients aged 60 to 74 years had benefit from NT-proBNP–guided therapy on the primary end point and HF hospitalization-free survival, whereas patients aged ≥75 years did not (P<0.10 for interaction). In landmark analysis, there was no regression to the mean after cessation of the NT-proBNP–guided strategy. More intensified HF medication at month 12 was associated with better long-term HF hospitalization-free and overall survival. Conclusions—Intensified, NT-proBNP–guided therapy did not improve the primary end point compared with symptom-guided therapy but did improve HF hospitalization-free survival. Within the subgroup of patients aged 60 to 74 years, it improved clinical outcome including the primary end point. These effects did not disappear after cessation of the NT-proBNP–guided strategy on the long-term. This is possibly attributable to a more intensified HF medical therapy in the NT-proBNP–guided group.
机译:背景—以N端前B型钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)水平为指导的疗法可能会改善患有慢性心力衰竭(HF)的患者的结局,尤其是在左室射血分数降低的年轻患者中。目前尚不清楚NT-proBNP指导的治疗策略中止后治疗效果是否持续。方法和结果—对老年充血性心力衰竭患者进行强化治疗与标准药物治疗的试验,将499例≥60岁,左心室射血分数≤45%的HF患者随机分为接受NT-proBNP引导和标准症状指导的强化治疗分为18个月内的指定年龄段(60-74岁和≥75岁)。共有329名患者(92%)在18个月时还活着,接受了长期随访。在NT-proBNP指导的组中,HF药物的使用范围更大。在长期的NT-proBNP指导治疗中,无医院治疗(主要终点:危险比,0.87; 95%置信区间,0.71-1.06; P = 0.16)或总体生存率(危险比,0.85; 95)没有改善。 %置信区间0.64–1.13; P = 0.25),但确实改善了无心衰住院的生存率(危险比,0.70; 95%置信区间,0.55-0.90; P = 0.005)。 60-74岁的患者在主要终点和无HF住院生存中受益于NT-proBNP指导的治疗,而≥75岁的患者则没有(交互作用P <0.10)。在地标分析中,NT-proBNP指导的策略停止后均值没有回归。在第12个月,更多的高频药物治疗与长期无高频住院治疗和总体生存率相关。结论:与症状指导疗法相比,强化的NT-proBNP指导疗法不能改善主要终点,但可以改善无心衰住院的生存率。在60至74岁的患者亚组中,它改善了包括主要终点在内的临床结局。长期停止NT-proBNP指导的策略后,这些效果并没有消失。这可能归因于NT-proBNP引导的人群中高频药物治疗的加强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号