首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced nursing >Laddered questions and qualitative data research interviews.
【24h】

Laddered questions and qualitative data research interviews.

机译:阶梯式问题和定性数据研究访谈。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Nurse researchers frequently make use of open interviews in their studies, hoping to understand the private world of respondents, and in particular the ways in which thought and behaviour are connected to each other. Unfortunately, there is scant guidance on how to translate such goals into the specifics of interview technique, particularly the use of probing questions. The success of such interviews rests on working ethically and understanding the respondents needs during interview. AIMS: This paper explains a technique designed to direct the use of probing in interviews, and argues that its selective use might provide richer data than other ad hoc approaches employed by neophyte researchers. CONCLUSION: It is argued that the technique increases the awareness of the researcher to ethical concerns and enables her or him to respond more sensitively. Laddered question technique is evaluated with reference to my own research into the negotiation of student support amongst nurse distance learners.
机译:背景:护士研究人员在研究中经常使用公开访谈,以期了解受访者的私人世界,尤其是思想和行为之间相互联系的方式。不幸的是,关于如何将这些目标转化为面试技巧的细节,尤其是探究性问题的使用的指导很少。这种访谈的成功取决于道德操守和理解受访者在访谈中的需求。目的:本文解释了一种旨在指导采访中探测使用的技术,并认为与初学者研究人员采用的其他临时方法相比,它的选择性使用可能提供更丰富的数据。结论:有人认为该技术提高了研究人员对道德问题的认识,并使研究人员能够更敏感地做出回应。参照我自己对护士远程学习者之间的学生支持协商的研究,对阶梯式提问技术进行了评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号