首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology >Left ventricular endocardial pacing improves resynchronization therapy in canine left bundle-branch hearts.
【24h】

Left ventricular endocardial pacing improves resynchronization therapy in canine left bundle-branch hearts.

机译:左心室心内膜起搏改善犬左束支心脏的再同步治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: We investigated the benefits of the more physiological activation achieved by left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing (ENDO) as compared with conventional epicardial (EPI) LV pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 8 anesthetized dogs with experimental left bundle-branch block, pacing leads were positioned in the right atrium, right ventricle, and at 8 paired (EPI and ENDO) LV sites. Systolic LV pump function was assessed as LVdP/dtmax and stroke work and diastolic function as LVdP/dtmin. Electrical activation and dispersion of repolarization were determined from 122 epicardial and endocardial electrodes and from analysis of the surface ECG. Overall, ENDO-biventricular (BiV) pacing more than doubled the degree of electrical resynchronization and increased the benefit on LVdP/dtmax and stroke work by 90% and 50%, respectively, as compared with EPI-BiV pacing. During single-site LV pacing, the range of AV intervals with a >10% increase in LV resynchronization (79+/-31 versus 32+/-24 ms, P<0.05) and LVdP/dtmax (92+/-29 versus 63+/-39 ms) was significantly longer for ENDO than for EPI pacing. EPI-BiV but not ENDO-BiV pacing created a significant (40+/-21 ms) transmural dispersion of repolarization. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this acute animal study indicate that the use of an endocardial LV pacing electrode may increase the efficacy of resynchronization therapy as compared with conventional epicardial resynchronization therapy.
机译:背景:我们调查了在心脏再同步治疗中与常规心外膜(EPI)LV起搏相比,左心室(LV)心内起搏(ENDO)实现更多生理激活的好处。方法和结果:在8只麻醉的实验性左束支传导阻滞的狗中,起搏导线位于右心房,右心室和8个配对的(EPI和ENDO)LV部位。收缩期LV泵功能评估为LVdP / dtmax,中风功和舒张功能评估为LVdP / dtmin。从122个心外膜和心内膜电极以及表面心电图分析确定电激活和复极化分散。总体而言,与EPI-BiV起搏相比,ENDO-双心室(BiV)起搏使电同步度提高了一倍以上,并且使LVdP / dtmax和中风功的获益分别增加了90%和50%。在单点LV起搏期间,AV间隔范围的LV重新同步(79 +/- 31 vs 32 +/- 24 ms,P <0.05)和LVdP / dtmax(92 +/- 29 vs. ENDO的起搏时间为63 +/- 39毫秒)明显长于EPI起搏。 EPI-BiV起搏而不是ENDO-BiV起搏产生了明显的(40 +/- 21 ms)跨壁分散性复极。结论:这项来自急性动物研究的数据表明,与传统的心外膜再同步治疗相比,心内膜LV起搏电极的使用可提高再同步治疗的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号