首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Feed intake, ruminal fermentation, and animal behavior of beef heifers fed forage free diets containing nonforage fiber sources.
【24h】

Feed intake, ruminal fermentation, and animal behavior of beef heifers fed forage free diets containing nonforage fiber sources.

机译:饲喂含有非饲料纤维源的无饲料日粮的小母牛的饲料摄入,瘤胃发酵和动物行为。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Eight Simmental heifers (initial BW 313.4 + 13.2 kg) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental treatments in a 4 x 4 double Latin square design. The experiment was performed in four 28-d periods. Treatments tested were a control diet in which barley straw (BS) was used as a fiber source and 3 diets where the main difference was the nonforage fiber source used: soybean hulls (SH), beet pulp (BP) in pellets, and whole cottonseed (WCS). All ingredients, except the fiber sources, were ground through a 3-mm screen. Fiber ingredients were incorporated at 10, 17, 17, and 16% (on DM basis) in BS, SH, BP, and WCS, respectively. All diets were offered ad libitum as total mixed ration and designed to be isoenergetic (2.95 Mcal ME/kg DM), isonitrogenous (15% CP, DM basis), and with a NDF content of 20% (on DM basis) although there was a discrepancy between the theoretical and the actual chemical composition of the diets. Particle size separation was performed using the 3-screen Penn State Particle Separator. Animals were allotted in 8 individual roofed concrete pens equipped with a feedbunk and water trough. Intake was recorded over 7 d in the last week of each experimental period. Behavior was recorded for 24-h on d 2 and d 6 of each experimental week using a digital video recording device. A digital color camera was set up in front of each pen. Data recorded, except behavioral activities, were statistically analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. To test treatment effect for each behavioral activity, analysis was performed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. Diets ranked from greater to lesser proportion of particles of less than 1.18 mm as follows: SH, BS, WCS, and BP. Dry matter intake of heifers fed WCS was greater than the remaining treatments (P = 0.049). The greatest average ruminal pH was registered in heifers fed BS (6.4) and BP (6.3) whereas the smallest was recorded in SH diet (5.9), with WCS (6.2) occupying an intermediate position (P = 0.006). Total chewing time was greater (P = 0.001) in BS and WCS than in SH and BP. In conclusion, the nonforage fiber sources tested in this experiment can be used in forage-free diets fed to beef heifers as total mixed ration (TMR) without negative consequences in DMI in SH and BP diets and with an increased DMI in WCS diet. The WCS diet promoted rumination and total chewing time to the same degree as BS, which demonstrates that it is equally effective as this forage fiber source.
机译:在4 x 4双拉丁方形设计中,将8只西门塔尔小母牛(初始体重313.4 + 13.2千克)随机分配到4种实验处理中的1种。实验分四个28天进行。所测试的处理方法是使用大麦秸秆(BS)作为纤维来源的对照饮食,以及使用非饲料纤维来源的3种饮食的主要区别:大豆壳(SH),颗粒中的甜菜浆(BP)和全棉种子(WCS)。除纤维来源外,所有成分均通过3毫米筛网进行研磨。纤维成分分别以10%,17%,17%和16%(以DM为基准)掺入BS,SH,BP和WCS中。所有饮食均随意提供总混合配比,设计为等能量(2.95 Mcal ME / kg DM),等氮(15%CP,DM基准),NDF含量为20%(DM基准),尽管有饮食的理论和实际化学成分之间存在差异。使用三筛宾州粒子分离器进行粒度分离。将动物分配到8只装有屋顶的混凝土钢笔中,这些钢笔配有料槽和水槽。在每个实验期的最后一周记录7天的摄入量。在每个实验周的第2天和第6天使用数字视频记录设备记录行为24小时。每支笔前面都装有一台数字彩色照相机。使用SAS的MIXED程序对记录的数据(行为活动除外)进行统计分析。为了测试每种行为活动的治疗效果,使用SAS的GLIMMIX程序进行了分析。日粮对小于1.18毫米的颗粒按从大到小的顺序排列如下:SH,BS,WCS和BP。饲喂WCS的小母牛的干物质摄入量高于其余处理(P = 0.049)。饲喂BS(6.4)和BP(6.3)的小母牛的最高平均瘤胃pH值,而SH饲粮(5.9)最低,而WCS(6.2)处于中间位置(P = 0.006)。 BS和WCS的总咀嚼时间大于SH和BP的总咀嚼时间(P = 0.001)。总之,在本实验中测试的非饲草纤维源可用于以全混合日粮(TMR)饲喂牛肉小母牛的无饲草日粮,对SH和BP日粮的DMI无负面影响,而WCS日粮的DMI增加。 WCS饮食促进反刍和总咀嚼时间与BS相同,这表明它与这种饲料纤维来源同样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号