...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Influence of slice baling on feeding value of alfalfa hay in receiving and finishing diets for feedlot cattle.
【24h】

Influence of slice baling on feeding value of alfalfa hay in receiving and finishing diets for feedlot cattle.

机译:切片打包对饲育牛饲喂和精加工日粮苜蓿干草的饲喂价值的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Three studies were conducted to evaluate the feeding value of slice alfalfa hay in feedlot diets. In Exp. 1, 108 steer calves (183.1 pl 1.2 kg initial BW; 6 pens/treatment) were used in a completely randomized design to evaluate the effect of baling method on performance and morbidity of newly received calves. The study lasted 28 d. Treatments consisted of a 65% concentrate receiving diet containing 1) ground or 2) slice alfalfa hay. Steer calves were fed daily at 0800 h. Animals also received long-stem sudangrass hay the first 7 d. Steers were weighed on d 0, 16, and 28. Feed, sudangrass hay, or feed plus sudangrass hay intakes were not affected (P > 0.25) by treatment. Conversely, ADG from d 0 to 16 was greater (P < 0.001) for slice than ground (1.27 vs. 0.81 pl 0.067 kg/d, respectively) and from d 0 to 28 (1.23 vs. 0.91 pl 0.042 kg/d, respectively). In addition, G:F was greater (P < 0.001) for slice than ground hay from d 0 to 16 (0.39 vs. 0.25 pl 0.021), and from d 0 to 28 (0.31 vs. 0.24 pl 0.013 for slice and ground, respectively). Moreover, morbidity (40.5 pl 3.9%; P = 0.20) and retreatment rates (30.7 pl 7.5%; P = 0.14) were similar for slice and ground. In Exp. 2, 176 crossbred steers (393.9 pl 10.8 kg initial BW) were used in an 84-d feeding experiment (4 pens/treatment) in a randomized complete block experimental design with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to evaluate effects of alfalfa baling method (ground or slice) and forage level (8 or 14%) on growth performance. Experimental diets were based on steam-flaked corn. Daily BW gain was greater (P = 0.10) for steers consuming ground compared with the slice hay diet. A baling method x forage level interaction (P = 0.07) was observed for DMI. Baling method did not (P = 0.98) influence DMI with 8% roughage level. But with 14% roughage, DMI was greater (P = 0.02) for steers consuming ground hay than the slice diet. The G:F ratio was affected (P = 0.03) only by forage level (0.194 vs. 0.182 pl 0.003 for 8 and 14% roughage, respectively). In Exp. 3, 4 ruminally cannulated mixed-breed steers were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design to evaluate effects on digestive function. No baling method effects (P >= 0.16) were detected for DM, OM, CP, or NDF intakes or DM, OM, and NDF total tract digestibility. Digestibility of NDF and OM were greater (P <= 0.08) for diets which contained 14% forage compared with diets that contained 8% forage. Slice baling improved alfalfa hay feeding value for feedlot receiving cattle. However, no major effects of slice baling alfalfa on finishing performance and digestion were observed.
机译:进行了三项研究,以评估切片苜蓿干草在育肥场日粮中的饲喂价值。在实验中1,108头牛犊(初始体重为183.1 pl 1.2千克体重; 6支/处理)用于完全随机设计,以评估打包方法对新收到的牛犊的性能和发病率的影响。该研究持续了28天。处理方法是由65%的浓缩饲料组成,这些饲料含有1)地面或2)苜蓿干草片。 daily牛每天0800小时喂食。动物在头7天也接受了长茎的苏丹草干草。在第0、16和28天对牛皮进行称重。处理不影响饲料,苏丹草干草或饲料加苏丹草干草的摄入量(P> 0.25)。相反,切片的d 0到16的ADG大于地面(分别为1.27和0.81 pl 0.067 kg / d)(p <0.001)和切片d 0到28(分别为1.23和0.91 pl 0.042 kg / d)。 )。此外,切片的G:F从d 0到16(0.39 vs. 0.25 pl 0.021)和切片d到d 0到28(0.31 vs. 0.24 pl 0.013)比切片的干草高(P <0.001),分别)。此外,切片和地面的发病率(40.5 pl 3.9%; P = 0.20)和复治率(30.7 pl 7.5%; P = 0.14)相似。在实验中2,84 d饲喂实验(4笔/处理)中,将176头杂交(牛皮(393.9 pl 10.8 kg初始体重)用于84天饲喂实验(2笔×2因子处理排列)以评估苜蓿打包的效果方法(地面或切片)和饲料水平(8%或14%)对生长性能的影响。实验饮食以蒸玉米片为基础。与切成片的干草相比,consuming牛的日增重(P = 0.10)更大。对于DMI,观察到打包方法x饲草水平交互作用(P = 0.07)。打包方法没有(P = 0.98)以8%粗料水平影响DMI。但是,粗饲料含量为14%时,食用干草的公牛的DMI大于切片饮食的DMI(P = 0.02)。 G:F比仅受草料水平的影响(P = 0.03)(粗饲料分别为8%和14%时分别为0.194和0.182 pl 0.003)。在实验中在4 x 4的拉丁方形设计中使用3、4个瘤胃插管的混种ste牛来评估对消化功能的影响。对于DM,OM,CP或NDF摄入量或DM,OM和NDF总道消化率,未检测到打包方法效果(P> = 0.16)。饲喂14%饲草的日粮与饲喂8%饲草的日粮相比,NDF和OM的消化率更高(P <= 0.08)。切片打包提高了饲喂牛场的苜蓿干草饲喂价值。然而,没有观察到切片打包苜蓿对整理性能和消化的主要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号