...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >Ocular motor differences between melancholic and non-melancholic depression.
【24h】

Ocular motor differences between melancholic and non-melancholic depression.

机译:忧郁抑郁症和非忧郁抑郁症之间的眼动差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder may be a heterogeneous disorder, yet melancholic depression is the most consistently described subtype, regarded as qualitatively different to non-melancholic depression in terms of cognitive and motor impairments. Eye movement studies in depression are infrequent and findings are inconclusive. METHODS: This study employed a battery of saccadic eye movement tasks to explore reflexive saccades, as well as higher order cognitive aspects of saccades including inhibitory control and spatial working memory. Nineteen patients with major depressive disorder (9 melancholic; 10 non-melancholic) and 15 healthy controls participated. RESULTS: Differences were revealed between melancholic and non-melancholic patients. Melancholia was associated with longer latencies, difficulty increasing peak velocities as target amplitudes increased, and hypometric primary saccades during the predictable protocol. In contrast, the non-melancholic depression group performed similarly to controls on most tasks, but saccadic peak velocity was increased for reflexive saccades at larger amplitudes. LIMITATIONS: Most patients were taking antidepressant medication. CONCLUSIONS: The latency increases, reduced peak velocity and primary saccade hypometria with more severe melancholia may be explained by functional changes in the fronto-striatal-collicular networks, related to dopamine dysfunction. In contrast, the serotonergic system plays a greater role in non-melancholic symptoms and this may underpin the observed increases in saccadic peak velocity. These findings provide neurophysiological support for functional differences between depression subgroups that are consistent with previous motor and cognitive findings.
机译:背景:重度抑郁症可能是异质性疾病,但忧郁症抑郁症是最一致描述的亚型,就认知和运动障碍而言,与非忧郁症抑郁症在质量上有所不同。抑郁症中的眼动研究很少,研究结果尚无定论。方法:这项研究采用了一系列的眼球运动任务来探索反射性扫视,以及扫视的高阶认知方面,包括抑制性控制和空间工作记忆。 19名重度抑郁症患者(9名忧郁症患者; 10名非忧郁症患者)和15名健康对照者参加。结果:忧郁患者和非忧郁患者之间存在差异。忧郁症与更长的潜伏期,随着目标幅度的增加难以增加峰值速度以及在可预测方案中出现低估的初级扫视有关。相比之下,非忧郁抑郁症组在大多数任务上的表现与对照组相似,但是反射性扫视在更大的幅度下,跳动的峰值速度会增加。局限性:大多数患者正在服用抗抑郁药。结论:潜伏期增加,峰值速度降低和原发性扫视子宫内膜增生伴更严重的忧郁症可能是由额叶-纹状体-胶状网络的功能变化引起的,与多巴胺功能障碍有关。相反,血清素能系统在非忧郁症状中起着更大的作用,这可能是观察到的眼跳峰值速度增加的基础。这些发现为抑郁亚组之间的功能差异提供了神经生理学支持,这些差异与先前的运动和认知发现一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号