...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >The influence of personality factors on paroxetine response time in patients with major depression.
【24h】

The influence of personality factors on paroxetine response time in patients with major depression.

机译:人格因素对重度抑郁症患者帕罗西汀反应时间的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Determining the factors that predict antidepressant response and offering suitable treatments to people who suffer from major depressive disorder (MDD) is important. We investigated the personality factors that influence paroxetine treatment response by dividing antidepressant responders into two groups. METHODS: We treated 93 patients with MDD using 40 mg/day of paroxetine for six weeks. We used the Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) to evaluate each participant's personality before the treatment. Of the 93 patients, 75 completed the protocol. The Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was used to evaluate depressive symptoms before the treatment and at one-, two-, four-, and six-week intervals. We divided the patients into four groups: later responders (LRs), early responders (ERs), nonresponders (NRs), and dropouts (DOs). RESULTS: Compared with 91 normal control participants, patients with MDD had less novelty seeking and self-directedness and greater harm avoidance. ERs showed less harm avoidance and more self-directedness than the other groups. LRs' TCI scores did not differ from the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ERs' personality characteristics are different from those of other patients with MDD and that evaluating patients' personality using the TCI at baseline may predict their antidepressant response. LIMITATIONS: Our sample of patients with MDD was small. Some of the patients with severe MDD had difficulty completing the TCI.
机译:背景:确定预测抗抑郁反应的因素并为重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者提供合适的治疗方法很重要。我们通过将抗抑郁药应答者分为两组来研究影响帕罗西汀治疗应答的人格因素。方法:我们使用40毫克/天的帕罗西汀治疗93例MDD患者,持续6周。我们使用克隆人的气质和性格量表(TCI)在治疗前评估每个参与者的性格。在93位患者中,有75位完成了方案。蒙哥马利·阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)用于在治疗前以及每隔一,两,四和六周的时间评估抑郁症状。我们将患者分为四组:晚期反应者(LRs),早期反应者(ERs),无反应者(NRs)和退出者(DOs)。结果:与91名正常对照参与者相比,MDD患者寻求新颖性和自我指导性更少,避免伤害更大。 ERs较其他组别显示出更少的回避伤害和更多的自我导向。 LR的TCI分数与其他组没有差异。结论:这些结果表明,ERs的人格特征与其他MDD患者不同,并且在基线时使用TCI评估患者的人格可以预测其抗抑郁反应。局限性:我们的MDD患者样本很小。一些患有严重MDD的患者难以完成TCI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号