首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >Validity of retrospective measures of early maltreatment and depressive episodes using the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA) instrument - A life-course study of adult chronic depression - 2.
【24h】

Validity of retrospective measures of early maltreatment and depressive episodes using the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA) instrument - A life-course study of adult chronic depression - 2.

机译:使用儿童护理和虐待经历(CECA)的早期虐待和抑郁发作的回顾性措施的有效性-成人慢性抑郁症的终生研究-2。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: A previous paper, using data collected retrospectively from sister pairs, reported substantial associations of adult depressive episodes lasting at least 12 months with childhood maltreatment [Brown, G.W., Craig, T.K.J., Harris, T.O. Handley, R.V. & Harvey, A.L. 2007a-this issue. Development of a retrospective interview measure of parental maltreatment using the Childhood Experience of Care & Abuse (CECA) instrument - a life-course study of adult chronic depression - 1. J. Affect. Disord. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.05.022]. Risk was far less when depressive episodes of any duration were considered. This paper considers how much scientific weight can be placed on these findings in the light of doubt often expressed about retrospective collection of childhood and adult data. METHODS: The retrospectively gathered material was obtained from adult sister pairs within 5 years of age, comprising a high-risk series (n = 118) where the first sister was selected as likely to have experienced childhood abuse or neglect, and a comparison series (n = 80) where she was selected at random. Current age ranged between early 20s and 50s. Data was collected by semi-structured interviews, using investigator-based ratings covering a wide range of parental behaviour and childhood behaviour. RESULTS: A series of analyses failed to reveal evidence of significant bias in the collection of material about adult depression or parental maltreatment. There was, however, some evidence of under reporting. LIMITATIONS: Conclusions from such analyses can only be judged in terms of degree of plausibility. CONCLUSIONS: Nothing emerged to suggest the presence of significant bias in the aetiological findings of our earlier paper. There is evidence of some underreporting of both early adverse experience and adult depressive episodes, but this is unlikely to threaten the conclusions drawn about the link of parental maltreatment with adult chronic depressive episodes.
机译:背景:以前的一篇论文,使用从姐妹对中回顾性收集的数据,报道了持续至少12个月的成人抑郁发作与儿童期虐待的相关性[Brown,G.W.,Craig,T.K.J.,Harris,T.O.汉德利(R.V.) &Harvey,A.L. 2007a-此问题。使用儿童期护理和虐待经历(CECA)仪器开发的一项针对父母虐待的回顾性访谈方法-对成人慢性抑郁症的终生研究-1. J.影响。不和谐doi:10.1016 / j.jad.2007.05.022]。当考虑任何持续时间的抑郁发作时,风险要小得多。鉴于经常对儿童和成人数据的回顾性收集存有疑问,本文考虑了可以对这些发现给予多少科学重视。方法:回顾性收集的资料是从5岁以内的成年姐妹对中获得的,包括高风险系列(n = 118),其中第一姐妹被选为可能经历了童年的虐待或忽视,以及比较系列( n = 80),她是随机选择的。目前的年龄介于20到50年代初期。数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的,使用了基于调查员的评估,涵盖了广泛的父母行为和儿童行为。结果:一系列分析未能揭示证据表明在收集有关成人抑郁症或父母虐待的材料方面存在明显偏见。但是,有一些证据表明报告不足。局限性:这些分析的结论只能根据合理程度来判断。结论:没有任何迹象表明在我们早期论文的病因学发现中存在明显的偏见。有证据表明,早期不良经历和成人抑郁发作的报道不足,但这不太可能威胁到父母虐待与成人慢性抑郁发作之间联系的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号