...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology >Single-ring posterior left atrial (box) isolation results in a different mode of recurrence compared with wide antral pulmonary vein isolation on long-term follow-up: longer atrial fibrillation-free survival time but similar survival time free of any atrial arrhythmia.
【24h】

Single-ring posterior left atrial (box) isolation results in a different mode of recurrence compared with wide antral pulmonary vein isolation on long-term follow-up: longer atrial fibrillation-free survival time but similar survival time free of any atrial arrhythmia.

机译:与长期随访中的宽肺窦肺静脉隔离相比,单环左心房(盒)隔离导致不同的复发模式:更长的无房颤的生存时间,但相似的生存时间,无任何心律失常。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Electric isolation of the pulmonary veins and posterior left atrium with a single ring of radiofrequency lesions (single-ring isolation [SRI]) may result in fewer atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences than wide antral pulmonary vein isolation (wide antral isolation [WAI]) by abolishing extravenous AF triggers. The effect of mitral isthmus line (MIL) ablation on outcomes after SRI has not previously been assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 220 consecutive patients (58 ± 10 years old; 82% men) with highly symptomatic AF (61% paroxysmal, 39% persistent/longstanding persistent) to undergo either SRI or WAI. Half of each cohort was also randomly allocated to have left lateral MIL ablation (2 ×2 factorial study design). Patients were followed clinically and with 7-day Holter studies for arrhythmia recurrences. The primary end points were recurrence of AF and organized atrial tachyarrhythmias. AF-free survival at 2 years was better after SRI (74% [95% CI, 65%-82%]) than WAI (61% [51%-70%]; P=0.031). Organized atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival was similar after SRI and WAI (67% [57%-75%] ersus 64% [54%-72%], respectively, at 2 years; P=0.988). MIL ablation resulted in better 2-year organized atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival (71% [62%-79%] versus 60% [50%-69%]; P=0.07), which approached statistical significance. Survival free of any atrial arrhythmia after one procedure was not significantly affected by isolation technique or MIL ablation. Conclusions- SRI resulted in fewer AF recurrences compared with WAI on long-term follow-up but did not reduce the recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias. MIL ablation may reduce organized atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.anzctr.org.au; ACTRN12606000467538.
机译:背景:肺静脉和左心房后部的电隔离与单个射频损伤环(单环隔离[SRI])相比,较宽的肛门肺静脉隔离(宽肛门隔离[WAI])可导致房颤(AF)复发的发生率降低]),取消静脉AF触发器。先前尚未评估二尖瓣峡部线(MIL)消融对SRI后结局的影响。方法和结果:我们随机分配220例高度症状性AF(61%阵发性,39%持续/长期持续)的连续患者(58±10岁; 82%男性)接受SRI或WAI。每个队列的一半也被随机分配以进行左侧外侧MIL消融(2×2析因研究设计)。临床后对患者进行了心律失常复发的7天动态心电图研究。主要终点是房颤复发和房速性心律失常。 SRI后2年无房颤生存率(74%[95%CI,65%-82%])优于WAI(61%[51%-70%]; P = 0.031)。在SRI和WAI后,有组织的无心律失常的存活率相似(2年时分别为67%[57%-75%] ers 64%[54%-72%]; P = 0.988)。 MIL消融可导致更好的2年有组织心律失常存活率(71%[62%-79%]与60%[50%-69%]; P = 0.07),具有统计学意义。隔离技术或MIL消融对一种手术后无房性心律失常的生存无明显影响。结论:在长期随访中,与WAI相比,SRI导致的AF复发较少,但并未减少所有房性心律失常的复发。 MIL消融可减少有组织的房性心律失常的复发。临床试验注册-http://www.anzctr.org.au; ACTRN12606000467538。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号