首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education (see comments)
【24h】

Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education (see comments)

机译:本科医学教育中的专业教学(见评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: There is a growing consensus among medical educators that to promote the professional development of medical students, schools of medicine should provide explicit learning experiences in professionalism. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether and how schools of medicine were teaching professionalism in the 1998-1999 academic year. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 2-stage survey was sent to 125 US medical schools in the fall of 1998. A total of 116 (92.3%) responded to the first stage of the survey. The second survey led to a qualitative analysis of curriculum materials submitted by 41 schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of learning experiences (didactic or experiential) in undergraduate medical curriculum explicitly intended to promote professionalism in medical students, with curriculum evaluation based on 4 attributes commonly recognized as essential to professionalism: subordination of one's self-interests, adherence to high ethical and moral standards, response to societal needs, and demonstration of evincible core humanistic values. RESULTS: Of the 116 responding medical schools, 104 (89.7%) reported that they offer some formal instruction related to professionalism. Fewer schools have explicit methods for assessing professional behaviors (n = 64 [55.2%]) or conduct targeted faculty development programs (n = 39 [33.6%]). Schools use diverse strategies to promote professionalism, ranging from an isolated white-coat ceremony or other orientation experience (n = 71 [78.9%]) to an integrated sequence of courses over multiple years of the curriculum (n = 25 [27.8%]). Of the 41 schools that provided curriculum materials, 27 (65.9%) addressed subordinating self-interests; 31 (75.6%), adhering to high ethical and moral standards; 17 (41.5%), responding to societal needs; and 22 (53.7%), evincing core humanistic values. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the teaching of professionalism in undergraduate medical education varies widely. Although most medical schools in the United States now address this important topic in some manner, the strategies used to teach professionalism may not always be adequate.
机译:背景:医学教育者之间日益增长的共识是,为促进医学生的专业发展,医学院应提供明确的专业学习经历。目的:确定1998-1999学年医学院是否以及如何教授专业知识。设计,地点和参与者:1998年秋季,我们对125所美国医学院进行了两阶段调查。第一阶段调查共有116例(92.3%)得到答复。第二次调查对41所学校提交的课程材料进行了定性分析。主要观察指标:本科医学课程中是否存在学习经验(无论是学说式还是体验式),明确旨在促进医学生的专业素养,课程评估基于4个通常被认为对专业素养必不可少的属性:对个人利益的服从,坚持遵守高道德和道德标准,对社会需求的回应并表现出明显的核心人文价值。结果:在116所响应的医学院中,有104所(占89.7%)报告说,它们提供了一些与专业有关的正式指导。很少有学校采用明确的方法来评估职业行为(n = 64 [55.2%])或进行有针对性的教师发展计划(n = 39 [33.6%])。学校采用各种策略来提升专业水平,从孤立的白大褂仪式或其他入学经历(n = 71 [78.9%])到课程多年的综合课程(n = 25 [27.8%])。 。在提供课程资料的41所学校中,有27所(65.9%)着重于个人利益。 31(75.6%),遵守高道德和道德标准; 17(41.5%),回应社会需求;和22(53.7%),体现了核心的人文价值。结论:我们的结果表明,本科医学教育中的专业教学差异很大。尽管现在美国大多数医学院都以某种方式解决了这一重要话题,但用于教授专业精神的策略可能并不总是足够的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号