首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Head and neck injuries among ice hockey players wearing full face shields vs half face shields.
【24h】

Head and neck injuries among ice hockey players wearing full face shields vs half face shields.

机译:戴着全脸防护罩与半脸防护罩的冰球运动员的头部和颈部受伤。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Speculation exists that use of a full face shield by ice hockey players may increase their risk of concussions and neck injuries, offsetting the benefits of protection from dental, facial, and ocular injuries, but, to our knowledge, no data exist regarding this possibility. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of sustaining a head or neck injury among intercollegiate ice hockey players wearing full face shields compared with those wearing half shields. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study conducted during the 1997-1998 Canadian Inter-University Athletics Union hockey season of 642 male hockey players (mean age, 22 years) from 22 teams. Athletes from 11 teams wore full face shields and athletes from 11 teams wore half face shields during play. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reportable injury, defined as any event requiring assessment or treatment by a team therapist or physician or any mild traumatic brain injury or brachial plexus stretch, categorized by time lost from subsequent participation and compared by type of face shield. RESULTS: Of 319 athletes who wore full face shields, 195 (61.6%) had at least 1 injury during the study season, whereas of 323 who wore half face shields, 204 (63.2 %) were injured. The risk of sustaining a facial laceration and dental injury was 2.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-3.48; P<.001) and 9.90 (95% CI, 1.88-52.1; P = .007) times greater, respectively, for players wearing half vs full face shields. No statistically significant risk differences were found for neck injuries, concussion, or other injuries, although time lost from participation because of concussion was significantly greater in the half shield group (P<.001), than in the group wearing full shields. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence that the use of full face shields is associated with significantly reduced risk of sustaining facial and dental injuries without an increase in the risk of neck injuries, concussions, or other injuries.
机译:背景:有猜测认为,冰上曲棍球运动员使用全面罩可能会增加脑震荡和颈部受伤的风险,从而抵消了保护牙齿,面部和眼部受伤的益处,但是据我们所知,尚无与此相关的数据可能性。目的:确定戴着半面罩的大学生冰上曲棍球运动员头部或颈部受伤的风险。设计,地点和参与者:前瞻性队列研究在1997-1998年加拿大大学间田径联合会的冰球赛季中,对来自22个团队的642名男性冰球运动员(平均年龄22岁)进行了研究。来自11支球队的运动员在比赛过程中戴了全面罩,来自11支球队的运动员在比赛中也戴了半罩。主要观察指标:可报告的损伤,是指需要由团队治疗师或医师进行评估或治疗的任何事件,或任何轻度的颅脑损伤或臂丛神经伸展,按随后参与所损失的时间进行分类,并按面罩类型进行比较。结果:在研究季节期间,戴全脸防护罩的319名运动员中,有195名(61.6%)受伤至少1次,而有半罩防护罩的323名运动员中,有204人(63.2%)受伤。维持面部撕裂伤和牙齿受伤的风险分别大2.31倍(95%置信区间[CI],1.53-3.48; P <.001)和9.90倍(95%CI,1.88-52.1; P = .007)。 ,适用于戴着半罩vs全面罩的玩家。尽管半罩组的脑震荡所致的时间损失显着大于穿全罩的组(P <.001),但未发现因颅脑损伤,脑震荡或其他伤害而造成的参与时间的统计学差异(P <.001)。结论:这些数据提供了证据,表明使用全脸防护罩可显着降低维持面部和牙齿受伤的风险,而不会增加颈部受伤,脑震荡或其他伤害的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号