首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Early vs late tracheotomy for prevention of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Early vs late tracheotomy for prevention of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:早期与晚期气管切开术预防成人机械通气ICU患者的肺炎:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Tracheotomy is used to replace endotracheal intubation in patients requiring prolonged ventilation; however, there is considerable variability in the time considered optimal for performing tracheotomy. This is of clinical importance because timing is a key criterion for performing a tracheotomy and patients who receive one require a large amount of health care resources. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of early tracheotomy (after 6-8 days of laryngeal intubation) compared with late tracheotomy (after 13-15 days of laryngeal intubation) in reducing the incidence of pneumonia and increasing the number of ventilator-free and intensive care unit (ICU)-free days. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled trial performed in 12 Italian ICUs from June 2004 to June 2008 of 600 adult patients enrolled without lung infection, who had been ventilated for 24 hours, had a Simplified Acute Physiology Score II between 35 and 65, and had a sequential organ failure assessment score of 5 or greater. INTERVENTION: Patients who had worsening of respiratory conditions, unchanged or worse sequential organ failure assessment score, and no pneumonia 48 hours after inclusion were randomized to early tracheotomy (n = 209; 145 received tracheotomy) or late tracheotomy (n = 210; 119 received tracheotomy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia; secondary endpoints during the 28 days immediately following randomization were number of ventilator-free days, number of ICU-free days, and number of patients in each group who were still alive. RESULTS: Ventilator-associated pneumonia was observed in 30 patients in the early tracheotomy group (14%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-19%) and in 44 patients in the late tracheotomy group (21%; 95% CI, 15%-26%) (P = .07). During the 28 days immediately following randomization, the hazard ratio of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.42-1.04), remaining connected to the ventilator was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.87), remaining in the ICU was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.97), and dying was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.56-1.15). CONCLUSION: Among mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients, early tracheotomy compared with late tracheotomy did not result in statistically significant improvement in incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00262431.
机译:背景:气管切开术可代替需要长时间通气的患者进行气管插管。但是,在进行气管切开术的最佳时间上存在很大差异。这具有临床重要性,因为时间是进行气管切开术的关键标准,而接受气管切开术的患者需要大量的医疗保健资源。目的:确定早期气管切开术(喉管插管后6-8天)与晚期气管切开术(喉管插管后13-15天)在减少肺炎的发生率和增加无呼吸机重症监护次数方面的有效性无单位(ICU)天。设计,地点和患者:2004年6月至2008年6月在意大利的12个ICU中进行了一项随机对照试验,研究对象为600名无肺部感染的成年患者,这些患者通气24小时,其急性急性生理评分II在35至65之间,且器官功能衰竭评估得分为5或更高。干预:入选后48小时内呼吸状况恶化,连续器官功能衰竭评估评分不变或较差且无肺炎的患者被随机分配到早期气管切开术(n = 209; 145接受气管切开术)或晚期气管切开术(n = 210;接受119)气管切开术)。主要观察指标:主要终点为呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。随机分组后28天内的次要终点是无呼吸机天数,无ICU天数以及每组还活着的患者数。结果:在气管切开早期组中有30例患者出现呼吸机相关性肺炎(14%; 95%置信区间[CI],10%-19%);在气管切开晚期组中有44例患者出现呼吸机相关性肺炎(21%; 95%CI ,15%-26%)(P = .07)。在随机分组后的28天内,发展中的呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险比是0.66(95%CI,0.42-1.04),保持连接在呼吸机上的风险是0.70(95%CI,0.56-0.87),保留在ICU中为0.73(95%CI,0.55-0.97),死亡为0.80(95%CI,0.56-1.15)。结论:在机械通气的成人ICU患者中,早期气管切开术与晚期气管切开术相比,呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率没有统计学上的显着改善。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00262431。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号