首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Does this patient have a family history of cancer? An evidence-based analysis of the accuracy of family cancer history.
【24h】

Does this patient have a family history of cancer? An evidence-based analysis of the accuracy of family cancer history.

机译:该患者有家族病史吗?基于证据的家庭癌症史准确性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: A family history of certain cancers is associated with an increased risk of developing cancer. Both cancer screening and genetic services referral decisions are often based on self-reported pedigree information. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of self-reported family cancer history information. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles were retrieved by searching MEDLINE (1966-June 2004) using Medical Subject Headings family, genetic predisposition to disease, medical history taking, neoplasm, and reproducibility of results. Additional articles were identified through bibliography searches. STUDY SELECTION: Original studies in which investigators validated self-reported family history by reviewing the identified relatives' medical records, death certificate, or cancer registry information were included, as well as studies that evaluated breast, colon, ovarian, endometrial, and prostate cancers. DATA EXTRACTION: Two of the 3 investigators independently reviewed and abstracted data for estimating the likelihood ratios (LRs) of self-reported family cancer history information. Only data from studies that evaluated both positive and negative family cancer histories were included within the analyses. A total of 14 studies met the search criteria and were included in the review. DATA SYNTHESIS: For patients without a personal history of cancer, the positive and negative LRs of a family history of the following cancers in a first-degree relative were 23.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4-81.0) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.10-0.63) for colon cancer; 8.9 (95% CI, 5.4-15.0) and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.08-0.49) for breast cancer; 14.0 (95% CI, 2.2-83.4) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.31-1.52) for endometrial cancer; 34.0 (95% CI, 5.7-202.0) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.13-2.10) for ovarian cancer; and 12.3 (95% CI, 6.5-24.0) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.18-0.55) for prostate cancer, respectively. Positive predictive values tended to be better in articles concerning first-degree relatives compared with second-degree relatives. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported family cancer histories for first-degree relatives are accurate and valuable for breast and colon cancer risk assessments. Negative family history reports for ovarian and endometrial cancers are less useful, although the prevalence of these malignancies within families is low.
机译:背景:某些癌症的家族病史与罹患癌症的风险增加相关。癌症筛查和遗传服务转诊决策通常都基于自我报告的血统信息。目的:确定自我报告家族癌症史信息的准确性。数据来源:通过检索MEDLINE(1966年至2004年6月),使用医学主题词族,疾病的遗传易感性,病史,肿瘤以及结果的可重复性来检索英语文章。通过参考书目搜索可以找到其他文章。研究选择:包括原始研究,研究者通过审查所鉴定亲属的病历,死亡证明或癌症登记信息来验证自我报告的家族史,以及评估乳腺癌,结肠癌,卵巢癌,子宫内膜癌和前列腺癌的研究。 。数据提取:3名研究者中的2名独立审查和提取了数据,以估计自我报告的家族癌症史信息的似然比(LRs)。分析中仅包括评估阳性和阴性家族癌症史的研究数据。共有14项符合搜索标准的研究被纳入评价。数据综合:对于没有个人癌症史的患者,一级亲属中以下癌症的家族史的阳性和阴性LR分别为23.0(95%置信区间[CI],6.4-81.0)和0.25(95)结肠癌的%CI,0.10-0.63);乳腺癌为8.9(95%CI,5.4-15.0)和0.20(95%CI,0.08-0.49);子宫内膜癌为14.0(95%CI,2.2-83.4)和0.68(95%CI,0.31-1.52);卵巢癌为34.0(95%CI,5.7-202.0)和0.51(95%CI,0.13-2.10);前列腺癌分别为12.3(95%CI,6.5-24.0)和0.32(95%CI,0.18-0.55)。与一级亲属相比,一级亲属文章中的阳性预测值往往更好。结论:一级亲属患者报告的家庭癌症史是准确的,对于乳腺癌和结肠癌的风险评估具有重要价值。阴性的卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌家族史报道虽然在家庭中这些恶性肿瘤的患病率很低,但却没有什么用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号