首页> 外文期刊>Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology >Assessment of narrow angles by gonioscopy, Van Herick method and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
【24h】

Assessment of narrow angles by gonioscopy, Van Herick method and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

机译:通过测角镜,范海瑞克方法和前节光学相干断层扫描技术评估窄角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate anterior chamber (AC) angles using gonioscopy, Van Herick technique and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). METHODS: One hundred forty-eight consecutive subjects were enrolled. The agreement between any two of three diagnostic methods, gonioscopy, AS-OCT and Van Herick, was calculated in narrow-angle patients. The area under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) for discriminating between narrow and open angles determined by gonioscopy was calculated in all participants for AS-OCT parameter angle opening distance (AOD), angle recess area, trabecular iris surface area and anterior chamber depth (ACD). As a subgroup analysis, capability of AS-OCT parameters for detecting angle closure defined by AS-OCT was assessed in narrow-angle patients. RESULTS: The agreement between the Van Herick method and gonioscopy in detecting angle closure was excellent in narrow angles (kappa = 0.80, temporal; kappa = 0.82, nasal). However, agreement between gonioscopy and AS-OCT and between the Van Herick method and AS-OCT was poor (kappa = 0.11-0.16). Discrimination capability of AS-OCT parameters between open and narrow angles determined by gonioscopy was excellent for all AS-OCT parameters (AUC, temporal: AOD500 = 0.96, nasal: AOD500 = 0.99). The AUCs for detecting angle closure defined by AS-OCT image in narrow angle subjects was good for all AS-OCT parameters (AUC, 0.80-0.94) except for ACD (temporal: ACD = 0.70, nasal: ACD = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Assessment of narrow angles by gonioscopy and the Van Herick technique showed good agreement, but both measurements revealed poor agreement with AS-OCT. The angle closure detection capability of AS-OCT parameters was excellent; however, it was slightly lower in ACD.
机译:目的:使用角膜镜检查,范海里克技术和前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)评估前房(AC)角度。方法:连续入选148例受试者。在窄角患者中计算了三种诊断方法中的两种诊断方法之间的一致性,即角膜镜检查,AS-OCT和Van Herick。在所有参与者中,计算AS-OCT参数的角度张开距离(AOD),角凹入面积,小梁虹膜表面积和前房深度,以区分由角膜镜检查确定的狭窄角度和张开角度的接收器操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积(ACD)。作为亚组分析,评估了AS-OCT参数检测AS-OCT定义的闭角的能力。结果:Van Herick方法和角膜镜检查法在窄角检测中的一致性非常好(窄角kappa = 0.80,鼻角kappa = 0.82)。但是,角膜镜检查和AS-OCT之间以及Van Herick方法和AS-OCT之间的一致性很差(kappa = 0.11-0.16)。对于所有AS-OCT参数(AUC,时间:AOD500 = 0.96,鼻:AOD500 = 0.99),通过角膜镜检查确定的AS-OCT参数在开角和窄角之间的辨别能力非常出色。除了ACD(时间:ACD = 0.70,鼻:ACD = 0.63)以外,在窄角对象中检测AS-OCT图像定义的角度闭合的AUC对所有AS-OCT参数(AUC,0.80-0.94)都很好。结论:通过角膜镜检查和Van Herick技术评估狭窄角度显示出良好的一致性,但两次测量均显示与AS-OCT的一致性较差。 AS-OCT参数的闭角检测能力非常好;但是,在ACD中则略低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号