首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Sabotaging Civil Service Reform in Aid-Dependent Countries: Are Donors to Blame?
【24h】

Sabotaging Civil Service Reform in Aid-Dependent Countries: Are Donors to Blame?

机译:破坏依赖援助国的公务员制度改革:捐助者应受谴责吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

International development assistance has focused increasing resources on raising civil service capacity in low-income country administrations plagued by low pay, poor establishment controls, and the absence of merit-based human resource practice. At the same time, donors sabotage civil service capacity development over the longer term. Notwithstanding international accords calling on donors to curtail this behavior, collective action problems constrain donors from dismantling the projectized aid infrastructure that fragments government institutions. We identify practical implications of this collective action dilemma and explore alternative reform approaches. We examine an agency-level civil service reform (ACSR) in Cambodia, in comparative perspective, showing how strategic, incremental introduction of merit-based incentives yielded benefits in one ministry but faltered when the pilot was expanded to other agencies. To the extent that the accumulated ACSR experiences have achieved some, albeit limited, traction, they may offer a small but significant beacon for those seeking to move forward on civil service reform under difficult conditions.
机译:国际发展援助将重点放在增加资源上,以提高低收入国家行政部门的公务员能力,这些国家受到低薪,机构控制不力以及缺乏基于功绩的人力资源实践的困扰。同时,捐助者从长远来看破坏了公务员能力的发展。尽管国际协议呼吁捐助者减少这种行为,但集体行动问题仍然限制了捐助者拆除分散了政府机构的预计援助基础设施。我们确定了这种集体行动困境的实际含义,并探索了替代性的改革方法。我们以比较的角度考察了柬埔寨的机构级公务员制度改革(ACSR),显示了基于绩效的激励性战略性,渐进式引入如何在一个部委中产生收益,但是当试点扩展到其他机构时却步履蹒跚。在一定程度上,尽管累积的ACSR经验获得了一定的牵引力,但对于那些试图在困难的条件下推进公务员制度改革的人们来说,这些经验可能会提供一个小而重要的灯塔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号