首页> 外文期刊>Cladistics: The international journal of the Willi Hennig Society >Phylogenomics of Annelida revisited: a cladistic approach using genome-wide expressed sequence tag data mining and examining the effects of missing data
【24h】

Phylogenomics of Annelida revisited: a cladistic approach using genome-wide expressed sequence tag data mining and examining the effects of missing data

机译:重访Annelida的系统经济学:一种使用全基因组表达序列标签数据挖掘和检查缺失数据影响的分类方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We present phylogenomic analyses of the most comprehensive molecular character set compiled for Annelida and its constituent taxa, including over 347 000 aligned nucleotide sites for 39 taxa. The nucleotide data set was recovered using a pre-existing amino acid data set of almost 48 000 aligned sites as a backbone for tBLASTn searches against NCBI. In addition, orthology determinations of the loci in the original amino acid data set were scrutinized using an All vs All Reciprocal Best Hit approach, employing BLASTp, and examining for statistical interdependency among the loci. This approach revealed considerable sequence redundancy among the loci in the original data set and a new data set was compiled, with the redundancy removed. The newly compiled nucleotide data set, the original amino acid data set, and the new reduced amino acid data set were subjected to parsimony analyses and two forms of bootstrap resampling. The last-named data set also was analysed using a maximum-likelihood approach. There were two main objectives to these analyses: (i) to examine the general topology, including support, resulting from the analyses of the new data sets and (ii) to assess the consistency of the branching patterns across optimality criteria by comparison with previous probabilistic approaches. The phylogenetic hypotheses resulting from analyses of the three data sets are largely unsupported, reflecting the continued difficulty of finding numerous, reliable, and suitable loci for a group as ancient as Annelida. Resulting parsimonious hypotheses disagree, in some respects, with the previous probabilistic approaches; Sedentaria and, in most cases, Errantia are not supported as monophyletic groups but Pleistoannelida is recovered as a (unsupported) monophyletic group in one of the three parsimony analyses as well as the likelihood analysis. In addition, we performed missing data titration studies to estimate the impact of missing data on overall support and support for specific clades
机译:我们介绍了为Annelida及其组成的分类单元编制的最全面分子特征集的系统生物学分析,包括39个分类单元的超过347 000个比对核苷酸位点。使用已存在的将近48 000个比对位点的氨基酸数据集作为tBLASTn搜索NCBI的主链,恢复了核苷酸数据集。另外,使用All vs All Reciprocal Best Hit方法,使用BLASTp仔细检查原始氨基酸数据集中基因座的拼写确定,并检查这些基因座之间的统计依赖性。此方法显示了原始数据集中基因座之间的相当大的序列冗余,并编译了一个新的数据集,并删除了冗余。对新编辑的核苷酸数据集,原始氨基酸数据集和新的还原氨基酸数据集进行了简约分析和两种形式的自举重采样。姓氏数据集也使用最大似然法进行了分析。这些分析有两个主要目标:(i)检查新数据集分析产生的一般拓扑,包括支持;(ii)通过与先前的概率比较,评估跨最优性标准的分支模式的一致性。方法。对这三个数据集的分析所得出的系统发育假说在很大程度上不受支持,这反映出继续难以找到像Annelida这样的古老群体的众多,可靠和合适的基因座。由此产生的简约假设在某些方面与以前的概率方法不同。在三种简约性分析和可能性分析中的一种中,不支持将久坐不动和大多数情况下的Errantia作为单系群体,而将Pleistoannelida作为(不支持的)单系群体恢复。此外,我们进行了缺失数据滴定研究,以估算缺失数据对总体支持和特定进化枝支持的影响

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号