...
首页> 外文期刊>JAMA internal medicine >The kidney connection: holy grail or wild goose chase?
【24h】

The kidney connection: holy grail or wild goose chase?

机译:肾脏的联系:圣杯还是野鹅追?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In phase 3 clinical trials, ethical and financial concerns motivate sequential analyses in which the data are analyzed prior to completion of the entire planned study. Existing group sequential software accounts for the effects of these interim analyses on the sampling density by assuming that the contribution of subsequent increments is independent of the contribution from previous data. This independent increment assumption is satisfied in many common circumstances, including when using the efficient estimator. However, certain circumstances may dictate using an inefficient estimator, and the independent increment assumption may then be violated. Consequences of assuming independent increments in a setting where the assumption does not hold have not been previously explored. One important setting in which independent increments may not hold is the setting of longitudinal clinical trials. This paper considers dependent increments that arise because of heteroscedastic and correlated data in the context of longitudinal clinical trials that use a generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach. Both heteroscedasticity over time and correlation of observations within subjects may lead to departures from the independent increment assumption when using GEE. We characterize situations leading to greater departures in this paper. Despite violations of the independent increment assumption, simulation results suggest that operating characteristics of sequential designs are largely maintained for typically observed patterns of accrual, correlation, and heteroscedasticity even when using analyses that use standard software that depends on an independent increment structure. More extreme scenarios may require greater care to avoid departures from the nominal type I error rate and power. Copyright ? 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:在3期临床试验中,出于道德和财务考虑,需要进行顺序分析,在完成整个计划的研究之前先对数据进行分析。现有的组顺序软件通过假设后续增量的贡献独立于先前数据的贡献来解决这些临时分析对采样密度的影响。在许多常见情况下,包括在使用有效估计器时,都可以满足此独立的增量假设。但是,在某些情况下可能会要求使用低效的估算器,然后可能会违反独立的增量假设。以前没有探索过在假设不成立的情况下假设独立增量的后果。纵向临床试验的设置是其中可能无法保持独立增量的一个重要设置。本文考虑了在使用广义估计方程(GEE)方法的纵向临床试验的背景下,由于异方差和相关数据而产生的相关增量。使用GEE时,随着时间推移的异方差性以及受试者内部观察值的相关性均可能导致偏离独立增量假设。我们描述了导致更大偏离的情况。尽管违反了独立增量假设,但仿真结果表明,即使在使用依赖于独立增量结构的标准软件的分析中,对于通常观察到的权责发生制,相关性和异方差性模式,顺序设计的操作特性也得到了很大的维护。更极端的情况可能需要格外小心,以避免偏离I类标称错误率和功率。版权? 2014 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号