...
首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >The absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in coronary bifurcations: Insights from bench testing
【24h】

The absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in coronary bifurcations: Insights from bench testing

机译:在冠状动脉分叉处吸收生物可吸收的血管支架:台架试验的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of performing contemporary bifurcation techniques with the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) (BVS). Background The feasibility of using the BVS in bifurcation lesions is unknown. Methods We performed bifurcation stenting procedures including main-vessel stenting with ballooning of the side branch through the BVS struts, T-stenting and crush and culotte procedures, in a synthetic arterial model. Low-pressure final kissing balloon (FKB) inflation was performed to complete the procedures. Results Single-stent procedures optimally opened the side-branch ostium without deforming the main vessel BVS. T-stenting completely covered the side-branch ostium. In crush cases, we could easily re-cross the crushed BVS with the wire and balloon and achieve good results after deployment of the main-vessel BVS and FKB inflation. A 2-BVS culotte resulted in good paving of the main vessel. Disruption of 1 BVS strut was observed after FKB inflation with the 2 balloons inflated beyond the recommended limit of the BVS, as calculated by Finet's law. Conclusions Intervention of bifurcation lesions using the Absorb BVS using modern bifurcation techniques appears feasible in a coronary bifurcation model. Provisional stenting is recommended in the majority, with sequential balloon inflations and FKB inflation only when necessary. T or T-stenting and small protrusion stenting with a metal drug-eluting stent is preferable in case of crossover. A 2-BVS, T-stent technique can be performed in a high-angle bifurcation; otherwise, crush or culotte should be considered, using metal DES in the side branch. Two-BVS crush and culotte require careful evaluation, and should only be considered in patients with large-caliber main vessels.
机译:目的本研究旨在评估采用Absorb依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架(加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉的Abbott Vascular)(BVS)进行当代分叉技术的可行性。背景技术在分叉病变中使用BVS的可行性尚不清楚。方法在合成的动脉模型中,我们进行了分叉支架置入术,包括主血管支架置入术,通过BVS支杆膨胀侧支,T型支架,挤压和开槽术。进行低压最终接吻气球(FKB)充气以完成操作。结果单支架手术可在不使主血管BVS变形的情况下最佳地打开侧支静脉口。 T型支架完全覆盖了分支口。在挤压情况下,我们可以轻松地将破碎的BVS与金属丝和球囊交叉,并在部署主血管BVS和FKB充气后获得良好的效果。 2-BVS滑槽可以很好地铺平主船。 FKB充气后,观察到1个BVS支杆破裂,两个气球膨胀超过BVS的建议极限,这是根据菲内特定律计算得出的。结论采用现代分叉技术使用Absorb BVS干预分叉病变在冠状动脉分叉模型中似乎是可行的。在大多数情况下,建议使用临时支架置入术,仅在必要时才进行球囊充气和FKB充气。在交叉的情况下,最好使用金属药物洗脱支架进行T型或T型支架和小突起支架。 2-BVS,T型支架技术可以在高角度分叉中进行;否则,应考虑在侧支上使用金属DES压碎或踩踏。两个BVS挤压和滑槽需要仔细评估,并且仅应在具有大口径主血管的患者中考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号