首页> 外文期刊>Cladistics: The international journal of the Willi Hennig Society >Hovenkamp's ostracized vicariance analysis: testing new methods of historical biogeography
【24h】

Hovenkamp's ostracized vicariance analysis: testing new methods of historical biogeography

机译:Hovenkamp被排斥的方差分析:测试历史生物地理学的新方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All methods currently employed in cladistic biogeography usually give contrasting results and are theoretically disputed. In two overlooked papers, Hovenkamp (1997, 2001 ) strongly criticized methods currently used by biogeographers and proposed two other methods. However, his criticisms have remained unanswered and his methods rarely applied. I used three different data sets to show the superiority of Hovenkamp's methods. Both methods proposed by Hovenkamp do not suffer from the unrealistic assumptions that underlie other methods commonly used in cladistic biogeography. The method proposed in 2001 is more powerful than the previous method published in 1997, because it does not use a priori assumptions about the areas involved. However, the method proposed in 1997 may be a valid alternative for large data sets. pb The Willi Hennig Society 2007.
机译:目前在片状生物地理学中使用的所有方法通常会得出相反的结果,并且在理论上存在争议。 Hovenkamp(1997,2001)在两篇被忽略的论文中强烈批评了生物地理学家当前使用的方法,并提出了另外两种方法。但是,他的批评仍未得到解答,他的方法很少得到应用。我使用了三个不同的数据集来证明Hovenkamp方法的优越性。 Hovenkamp提出的两种方法都不会遭受不切实际的假设,这些假设是在集体生物地理学中常用的其他方法的基础。 2001年提出的方法比1997年发布的以前的方法功能更强大,因为它没有使用有关范围的先验假设。但是,1997年提出的方法可能是大数据集的有效替代方法。 pb 2007年威利·亨尼格学会(Willi Hennig Society)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号