...
首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >A clinical and angiographic study of the XIENCE v everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: The executive trial (executive RCT: Evaluating XIENCE v in a multi vessel disease)
【24h】

A clinical and angiographic study of the XIENCE v everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: The executive trial (executive RCT: Evaluating XIENCE v in a multi vessel disease)

机译:XIENCE v依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统在多支冠状动脉疾病患者中的临床和血管造影研究:这项行政试验(执行性RCT:评估XIENCE v在多支血管疾病中的应用)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives This study sought to investigate the efficacy and performance of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions in patients with 2- to 3-vessel multivessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD). Background Drug-eluting stents (DES) have emerged as an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with MV-CAD although first-generation DES yielded inferior efficacy and safety compared with surgery. Methods Prospective, randomized (1:1), multicenter feasibility trial was designed to assess angiographic efficacy of EES compared with the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in 200 patients, and a prospective, open-label, single-arm, controlled registry was designed to analyze the clinical outcome of EES at 1-year follow-up in 400 MV-CAD patients. For the randomized trial, the primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at 9 months. For the registry, the primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Results The primary endpoint per single lesion was significantly lower in the EES group compared with the PES group (-0.03 ± 0.49 mm vs. 0.23 ± 0.51 mm, p = 0.001). Similar results were observed when analyzing all lesions (0.05 ± 0.51 mm vs. 0.24 ± 0.50 mm, p < 0.001). Clinical outcome at 1 year yielded a composite of major adverse cardiac events of 9.2% in the single-arm registry, and 11.1% and 16.5% in the EES and PES randomized groups, respectively (p = 0.30). Conclusions The EXECUTIVE trial was a randomized pilot trial dedicated to the comparison of the efficacy of 2 different DES among patients with 2- to 3-vessel MV-CAD. The study shows lower in-stent late loss at 9 months with the EES XIENCE V compared with the PES TAXUS Libertè, and a low major adverse cardiac event rate at 1 year in patients with 2-to 3-vessel MV-CAD. (EXECUTIVE [EXecutive RCT: Evaluating XIENCE V in a Multi Vessel Disease]; NCT00531011)
机译:目的本研究旨在探讨XIENCE V依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)(Abbott Vascular,加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉)在2到3支多支血管多支冠状动脉病变中从头治疗冠状动脉病变的功效和性能。疾病(MV-CAD)。背景技术尽管与外科手术相比,第一代DES的疗效和安全性较差,但药物洗脱支架(DES)已成为MV-CAD患者常规冠状动脉搭桥手术的替代方法。方法设计了一项前瞻性随机(1:1)多中心可行性试验,以评估EES与TAXUS紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)相比在200例患者中的血管造影效果,并进行前瞻性,开放标签,单臂,对照注册旨在分析400名MV-CAD患者在1年随访中EES的临床结局。对于随机试验,主要终点是9个月时支架内晚期丢失。对于登记处,主要终点是在12个月时全因死亡,心肌梗死和局部缺血引起的靶血管血运重建的综合结果。结果EES组与PES组相比,单个病变的主要终点显着降低(-0.03±0.49 mm对0.23±0.51 mm,p = 0.001)。分析所有病变时,观察到相似的结果(0.05±0.51 mm对0.24±0.50 mm,p <0.001)。 1年时的临床结局在单臂注册表中产生了9.2%的主要不良心脏事件,在EES和PES随机分组中分别产生了11.1%和16.5%的综合事件(p = 0.30)。结论EXECUTIVE试验是一项随机试验试验,旨在比较2至3支MV-CAD患者中2种不同DES的疗效。研究表明,与PES TAXUSLibertè相比,EES XIENCE V在9个月时支架内晚期丢失较少,而2至3支MV-CAD患者在1年时的严重不良心脏事件发生率较低。 (行政[行政RCT:评估多血管疾病中的XIENCE V]; NCT00531011)

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号