【24h】

Amprenavir or Fosamprenavir plus Ritonavir in HIV Infection: Pharmacology, Efficacy and Tolerability Profile.

机译:Amprenavir或Fosamprenavir加Ritonavir在HIV感染中的作用:药理学,功效和耐受性概况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Amprenavir is an HIV-1 protease inhibitor, the first in vitro activity studies of which were published in 1995. During in vivo development, it became clear that the pharmacokinetics of the drug would result in patients taking a large number of pills daily. The first comparative studies of amprenavir versus other protease inhibitors showed it had comparatively weak activity. Thus, studies using low doses of ritonavir to enhance the pharmacokinetic profile of amprenavir were first communicated in 2000. Only a small number of clinical trials in HIV-1-infected patients have been published.The pharmacokinetics of amprenavir have been documented in both healthy individuals and in HIV-1-infected patients. Amprenavir trough plasma concentrations increase 3- to 10-fold and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increases 2- to 3-fold when using amprenavir 450 or 600mg combined with ritonavir 100mg twice daily. Peak concentrations of amprenavir are less influenced by ritonavir coadministration, with a1- to 2-fold increase. As there is no pharmacokinetic advantage to increasing ritonavir doses, the combination has only been used with low doses of ritonavir (100mg twice daily or 200mg once or twice daily). Concomitant use of currently available non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) - efavirenz or nevirapine - is possible when amprenavir is coadministered with ritonavir, despite the pharmacokinetic interactions described when they are used with amprenavir alone.Fosamprenavir (GW 433908) is a prodrug of amprenavir primarily metabolised to amprenavir in the epithelial cells of the intestine. At steady state, plasma trough concentrations and AUC are slightly greater with fosamprenavir (two pills of 700mg twice daily) than amprenavir (eight soft gel capsules of 150mg twice daily).The clinical adverse effects of amprenavir are similar whether administered unboosted or in combination with ritonavir. Skin rashes do not appear to be more frequent. With regard to lipid profiles, the addition of ritonavir to amprenavir induces an increase in cholesterol and triglyceride levels; however, prospective comparative studies are lacking.In short-term prospective trials in antiretroviral-naive individuals, virological suppression with highly active antiretroviral therapy containing amprenavir plus ritonavir is similar to or higher than with unboosted amprenavir, with a smaller pill intake. Few comparative data are available in treatment-experienced patients. In several small studies, different salvage regimens which included amprenavir plus ritonavir achieved undetectable viral levels in half of the patients.Although the I50V amino acid substitution is the key mutation conferring resistance to amprenavir, the accumulation of several mutations is needed to increase the IC(50) (concentration that produces 50% inhibition) of amprenavir. When used with ritonavir, the accumulation of six or more mutations among L10F/I/V, K20M/R, E35D, R41K, I54V, L63P, V82A/F/T/S and I84V leads to clear decrease in viral responseto treatment.In salvage regimens, coadministration of amprenavir with lopinavir/ritonavir induces variations in lopinavir and amprenavir concentrations (decrease or increase in both drug concentrations) compared with the combination with ritonavir alone. Currently, close pharmacokinetic follow-up is mandatory when such combinations are used.There are sufficient data available today to support coadministration of reduced doses of amprenavir with low doses of ritonavir. Compared with amprenavir alone, this results in the administration of fewer pills with equivalent or higher efficacy, but without new clinical adverse effects. The concentrations of amprenavir achieved are high enough for use in treatment-experienced patients who have an accumulation of amino acid substitutions in the HIV-1 protease gene. It also allows combinations with NNRTIs.The pharmacokinetic properties of fosamprenavir and the first clinical trials in tre
机译:Amprenavir是一种HIV-1蛋白酶抑制剂,其首次体外活性研究于1995年发表。在体内开发过程中,很明显该药物的药代动力学会导致患者每天服用大量药丸。氨普那韦与其他蛋白酶抑制剂的首次比较研究表明,它的活性相对较弱。因此,在2000年首次进行了使用低剂量利托那韦增强安普那韦药代动力学研究的研究。在HIV-1感染患者中只有少数临床试验被发表。这两个健康个体均记录了安普那韦的药代动力学。以及感染了HIV-1的患者。当将安普那韦450或600mg与利托那韦100mg每天两次使用时,氨普那韦谷的血浆浓度增加3至10倍,浓度-时间曲线下的面积(AUC)增加2至3倍。安普那韦的峰值浓度受利托那韦共同给药的影响较小,增加了1至2倍。由于增加利托那韦剂量没有药代动力学优势,因此该组合仅与低剂量利托那韦一起使用(每天两次100mg,每天一次或两次200mg)。当氨普那韦与利托那韦共同使用时,尽管将其与阿普那韦单独使用时有药代动力学相互作用,但仍可以同时使用目前可用的非核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)-依非韦伦或奈韦拉平-氟苯那韦(GW 433908)是前药。安普那韦主要在肠道上皮细胞中代谢为安普那韦。在稳定状态下,福沙普那韦(每日两次两次700mg的两丸)的血浆谷浓度和AUC略高于氨普那韦(每日两次两次的150mg软胶囊8粒)。无论是不加药还是联合使用,氨普那韦的临床不良反应相似。利托那韦。皮疹似乎并不频繁。关于脂质分布,在安普那韦中添加利托那韦会引起胆固醇和甘油三酸酯水平的升高;然而,在未进行过抗逆转录病毒治疗的个体的短期前瞻性试验中,含有安普那韦+利托那韦的高效抗逆转录病毒疗法的病毒学抑制作用类似于或高于未经精制的安普那韦,且药丸摄入量较小。很少有比较数据可用于有治疗经验的患者。在几项小型研究中,包括阿普那韦+利托那韦在内的不同挽救方案在一半的患者中实现了无法检测到的病毒水平。尽管I50V氨基酸取代是赋予对阿普那韦耐药性的关键突变,但仍需要积累几个突变来增加IC( 50)(产生50%抑制作用的浓度)氨普那韦。与利托那韦一起使用时,L10F / I / V,K20M / R,E35D,R41K,I54V,L63P,V82A / F / T / S和I84V之间六个或更多突变的积累导致病毒对治疗的反应明显降低。挽救方案中,与单独使用利托那韦的组合相比,氨普那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦的共同给药引起洛匹那韦和氨普那韦浓度的变化(两种药物浓度降低或升高)。当前,当使用此类组合时,必须进行严格的药代动力学随访。今天有足够的数据支持减少剂量的氨普那韦与低剂量利托那韦的共同给药。与单独的氨普那韦相比,这导致更少的具有相同或更高功效的药丸给药,而没有新的临床不良反应。获得的氨普那韦的浓度足够高,可用于治疗经验丰富的患者,这些患者在HIV-1蛋白酶基因中具有氨基酸取代的积累。它还允许与NNRTIs组合使用.fosamprenavir的药代动力学特性和tre的首次临床试验

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号