首页> 外文期刊>Drugs: education, prevention, and policy >Non-NHS Residential Alcohol Resources are Allocated in an Inconsistent Manner: some preliminary data
【24h】

Non-NHS Residential Alcohol Resources are Allocated in an Inconsistent Manner: some preliminary data

机译:非NHS住宅酒精资源的分配方式不一致:一些初步数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The National Health Service and Community Care Act transferred the responsibility for the funding of residential alcohol services to social services in the United Kingdom. To date there has been minimal investigation into the impact of these changes. A questionnaire and semi-structured interview was administered to a designated community care assessor (CCA) from ten (eight women and two men) randomly selected London Boroughs. Eight were social workers, two of these were not professionally qualified. Nine respondents had previous professional contact with alcohol dependent subjects, but only two received any training for their new role. There were three areas of enquiry: first, training received; second, financial resources available; and third those areas which an expert panel thought would be important in relation to the allocation of funds. These were sixfold: equal opportunities; alcohol-related; medical; poly-drug; psychiatric; and forensic factors. The mean annual resources allocated by each borough were £71,000, range 6,000-150,000, (figures from 1998). The only area that was consistently endorsed as being a factor in the allocation of residential resources were psychiatric factors. Each respondent felt that a recent attempt at suicide or self-harm would be very important in their decision to grant funding. We conclude that there are no nationally agreed standards in the allocation of residential alcohol resources.Furthermore this study has shown training deficiencies, inconsistencies and the need for nationally agreed multidisciplinary standards in this area.
机译:《国家卫生服务和社区护理法》将为居民提供酒精服务的责任移交给了英国的社会服务。迄今为止,对这些更改的影响的研究很少。从随机选择的十个伦敦自治市镇(十名女性和两名男性)中,对指定的社区护理评估员(CCA)进行了问卷调查和半结构式访谈。有八名是社会工作者,其中两名没有专业资格。九名受访者以前曾与酒精依赖对象进行过专业接触,但只有两名受访者接受了有关其新角色的任何培训。涉及三个方面:第一,接受培训;第二,接受培训。第二,可用的财政资源;第三,专家组认为在资金分配方面很重要的领域。这些是六个方面:机会均等;与酒精有关;医疗多药精神病学和法医因素。每个行政区每年分配的平均资源为1,00071,000,范围为6,000-150,000(自1998年以来的数字)。唯一被一致认为是居民资源分配因素的领域是精神病因素。每个受访者都认为,最近自杀或自残的企图对他们决定拨款的重要性非常重要。我们得出的结论是,住宅酒精资源的分配没有国家认可的标准,此外,该研究还显示出培训方面的不足,不一致以及在该领域需要国家认可的多学科标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号