首页> 外文期刊>Drugs: education, prevention, and policy >Lessons from INSITE, Vancouver's supervised injection facility: 2003-2012
【24h】

Lessons from INSITE, Vancouver's supervised injection facility: 2003-2012

机译:温哥华监督注射设施INSITE的经验教训:2003年至2012年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper focuses on the evolution of INSITE, North America's first supervised injection site, first opened in 2003, and subjected to continuous empirical and political scrutiny from that date to the present. This analysis considers the relevant global history of supervised injection sites, and key events in the Canadian timeline. The article canvasses the origins of INSITE and its support by the Liberal government of Canada from 2003 to 2006, the change of federal government in 2006 and the decision of the Harper Conservatives to refuse to grant a continuing exemption to INSITE. The paper considers three court decisions, one by the B.C. Supreme Court in 2008, followed by a B.C. Court of Appeal decision in 2010, and, ultimately, the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in the fall 0f 2011, a decision that ordered the federal government to grant an operating exemption to INSITE. The paper examines how empirical evidence was presented to governments and to the courts, and how both governments and the judiciary interpreted the relevance of empirical evidence in the formulation of law and policy. The paper concludes by comparing the parallel experiences of Vancouver's INSITE with the MSIC in Sydney, Australia.
机译:本文着重介绍INSITE(北美第一个受监管注射站点)的演变,该站点于2003年首次开放,从那时到现在一直受到不断的经验和政治审查。该分析考虑了受监管注射场所的相关全球历史以及加拿大时间表中的关键事件。本文探讨了INSITE的起源以及2003年至2006年加拿大自由政府的支持,2006年联邦政府的更迭以及Harper保守党拒绝给予INSITE持续豁免的决定。该文件考虑了三项法院判决,其中一项是卑诗省的判决。最高法院在2008年,接着是卑诗省上诉法院在2010年做出的裁决,最终是加拿大最高法院在2011年秋天的0f做出的裁决,该裁决命令联邦政府对INSITE授予经营豁免。本文研究了如何向政府和法院提供经验证据,以及政府和司法机构如何解释经验证据在法律和政策制定中的相关性。本文通过比较温哥华的INSITE与澳大利亚悉尼的MSIC的平行经验得出结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号