首页> 外文期刊>Der Notarzt: Notfallmedizinische Informationen >The Judicial Legitimacy of an Analgesic-Based Sedation in EMS Without Supervision of a Physician Part 2: Analgesic-Based Sedation by Morphine in Case of an Acute Coronary Syndrome
【24h】

The Judicial Legitimacy of an Analgesic-Based Sedation in EMS Without Supervision of a Physician Part 2: Analgesic-Based Sedation by Morphine in Case of an Acute Coronary Syndrome

机译:在没有医师监督的情况下,基于EM的镇痛镇静剂的司法合法性第2部分:急性冠脉综合征时使用吗啡的基于镇痛镇静剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An analgesic-based sedation by morphine administrated by paramedics after an acute coronary syndrome can be legally allowed as far as those are particular trained, i. e. are able to control efficacy and adverse reactions as well as possible complications and judge if compared to the analgesic-based sedation with morphine less risky alternative measures come into question, and act in each individual case in accordance to a precise, also telephonic instruction of an emergency physician. In either case the administration of morphine necessarily must be offered before the arrival of the emergency physician in the interests of the patient. The authorising emergency physician always has to be called in disguise to the place of action to control the accuracy of indication and administration. The judicial responsibility remains at the emergency physician who underlies in this case elevated needs of diligence. The conditions set by the BtMW have to be obeyed principally. The analgesic-based sedation by morphine on the basis of an autonomic decision by paramedics is illegal. In this case they may commit a criminal offence according to ?9 Abs.l Nr.6b) of German Anaesthetic Act, even though an acceptance of the patient is available. From a judicial point of view it has to be recommended not to make the administration of morphine by paramedics in case of an acute coronary syndrome to be a Standard Operating Procedure, but to treat it only as an exception that needs a special medical justification in every single case.
机译:急性冠脉综合征后,可以合法地允许由医护人员使用吗啡进行镇痛镇静,只要这些镇静剂经过特殊训练即可。 e。能够控制疗效和不良反应以及可能的并发症,并判断是否与使用吗啡的基于镇痛药的镇静药物相比,风险较低的替代措施引起了疑问,并根据每种药物的精确,电话指导采取行动急诊医师。无论哪种情况,都必须在急诊医师到达之前为患者的利益提供吗啡的给药。总是必须变相召唤授权急诊医师,以控制行动地点,以控制适应症和给药的准确性。急诊医师仍然承担司法责任,在这种情况下,急诊医师是勤奋工作的基础。必须首先遵守BtMW设定的条件。在医护人员自主决定的基础上,使用吗啡进行镇痛镇静是非法的。在这种情况下,即使可以接受患者接受治疗,他们仍可能根据德国麻醉法第9条Abs.1 Nr.6b)构成刑事犯罪。从司法角度来看,建议不要在急性冠状动脉综合症的情况下,不要让护理人员对吗啡进行管理成为标准操作程序,而应仅将其作为需要在每个医疗机构中进行特殊医学辩护的例外情况单例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号