首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of the esophagus: official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus >Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies
【24h】

Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies

机译:食管癌新辅助放化疗与手术间隔时间的延长:已发表研究的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify whether a longer interval between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery is associated with better outcomes in esophageal cancer. nCRT followed by surgery is the most common approach for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Operations are performed within 2-8 weeks after nCRT; however, the optimal interval between nCRT and surgery for esophageal cancer is unknown. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Clinical Trials database for studies published between January 2000 and December 2014. Eligible studies were prospective or retrospective studies of esophageal cancer that assessed the effects of intervals longer or shorter than 7-8 weeks between the end of nCRT and surgery. The primary end-points were the overall survival (OS) and pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary end-points were anastomotic leak, R0 resection, and postoperative mortality rate. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) using fixed-effect and random-effect models, with Review Manager 5.2. The five studies that met the eligibility requirements included 1,016 patients: 520 in the shorter interval group (7-8 weeks) and 496 in the longer interval group (>7-8 weeks). The results of our meta-analysis indicate that a longer interval between nCRT and surgery may be disadvantageous for 2-year OS (OR = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.80, P = 0.010) and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.14-2.22, P = 0.009). The pCR, anastomotic leak rate, and postoperative morbidity were similar in the two groups. A longer interval (more than the standard 7-8 weeks) from the end of preoperative nCRT to surgery did not increase the rate of pCR in esophageal cancer, and the different intervals had similar effects on anastomotic leak rate and postoperative mortality rates. However, the longer interval between nCRT and surgery may be disadvantageous for long-term OS. These results should be validated prospectively in a randomized trial.
机译:这项荟萃分析的目的是阐明在食管癌中新辅助放化疗结束与手术之间的较长间隔是否与更好的预后相关。对于可切除的食管癌患者,nCRT手术是最常见的方法。在nCRT后2-8周内进行手术;但是,nCRT与食管癌手术之间的最佳间隔尚不清楚。我们在MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane对照试验中心登记册和临床试验数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,以研究2000年1月至2014年12月之间发表的研究。符合条件的研究是食管癌的前瞻性或回顾性研究,评估了间隔期的影响在nCRT结束与手术之间的间隔时间大于或小于7-8周。主要终点是总生存期(OS)和病理完全缓解(pCR)。次要终点是吻合口漏,R0切除和术后死亡率。使用带有Review Manager 5.2的固定效应和随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以估计比值比(OR)。符合资格要求的五项研究包括1,016名患者:较短间隔组(7-8周)为520名,较长间隔组(> 7-8周)为496名。我们的荟萃分析结果表明,对于2年OS(OR = 1.40,95%置信区间[CI]:1.09-1.80,P = 0.010)和R0切除率(nCRT和手术间隔较长)可能不利。 OR = 1.71,95%CI:1.14-2.22,P = 0.009)。两组的pCR,吻合口漏率和术后发病率相似。从术前nCRT结束到手术更长的时间间隔(超过标准的7-8周)不会增加食管癌中pCR的发生率,并且不同的间隔对吻合口漏率和术后死亡率具有相似的影响。但是,nCRT和手术之间的较长间隔可能不利于长期OS。这些结果应在随机试验中进行前瞻性验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号