...
首页> 外文期刊>Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology. >Speech-driven environmental control systems--a qualitative analysis of users' perceptions.
【24h】

Speech-driven environmental control systems--a qualitative analysis of users' perceptions.

机译:语音驱动的环境控制系统-对用户感知的定性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To explore users' experiences and perceptions of speech-driven environmental control systems (SPECS) as part of a larger project aiming to develop a new SPECS. The motivation for this part of the project was to add to the evidence base for the use of SPECS and to determine the key design specifications for a new speech-driven system from a user's perspective. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 users of SPECS from around the United Kingdom. These interviews were transcribed and analysed using a qualitative method based on framework analysis. RESULTS: Reliability is the main influence on the use of SPECS. All the participants gave examples of occasions when their speech-driven system was unreliable; in some instances, this unreliability was reported as not being a problem (e.g., for changing television channels); however, it was perceived as a problem for more safety critical functions (e.g., opening a door). Reliability was cited by participants as the reason for using a switch-operated system as back up. Benefits of speech-driven systems focused on speech operation enabling access when other methods were not possible; quicker operation and better aesthetic considerations. Overall, there was a perception of increased independence from the use of speech-driven environmental control. CONCLUSIONS: In general, speech was considered a useful method of operating environmental controls by the participants interviewed; however, their perceptions regarding reliability often influenced their decision to have backup or alternative systems for certain functions.
机译:目的:探索用户对语音驱动环境控制系统(SPECS)的体验和看法,这是旨在开发新SPECS的大型项目的一部分。该项目这一部分的动机是增加使用SPECS的证据基础,并从用户的角度确定新的语音驱动系统的关键设计规范。方法:对来自英国各地的12位SPECS用户进行了半结构化访谈。这些访谈被转录并使用基于框架分析的定性方法进行分析。结果:可靠性是对SPECS使用的主要影响。所有参与者都举例说明了他们的语音驱动系统不可靠的情况;在某些情况下,据报道这种不可靠性不是问题(例如,改变电视频道);然而,这被认为是对安全性要求更高的功能(例如开门)的问题。参与者认为可靠性是使用开关操作系统作为备份的原因。专注于语音操作的语音驱动系统的优势使得在无法使用其他方法时可以访问;更快的操作和更好的美学考虑。总体而言,人们认为从使用语音驱动的环境控制中可以提高独立性。结论:总体而言,受访者认为演讲是操作环境控制的一种有用方法。但是,他们对可靠性的看法通常会影响他们决定为某些功能配备备用系统或替代系统的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号