首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease >Diagnostic performance of whole-blood interferon-γ assay and enzyme-linked immunospot assay for active tuberculosis,
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of whole-blood interferon-γ assay and enzyme-linked immunospot assay for active tuberculosis,

机译:全血干扰素γ测定和酶联免疫斑点测定对活动性肺结核的诊断性能,

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 2 interferon-γ release assays, an enzyme-linked immunospot assay (T-SPOT.TB; Oxford Immunotec Ltd., Oxford, UK) and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-Tube assay (QFT-GIT; Cellestis Ltd., Carnegie, Australia), in patients with suspected active tuberculosis (TB). From October 2009 to October 2011, a total of 200 patients with suspected TB were enrolled. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of the patients were collected and blood samples were obtained for T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT assays. Among the 200 subjects, 98 (49%) had culture-confirmed TB, 18 (9%) had probable TB, and the remaining 84 (42%) subjects did not have TB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for active TB diagnosis by the T SPOT. TB were 83%, 71%, 81%, and 75%, respectively. For QFT-GIT, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for active TB diagnosis were 66%, 76%, 80%, and 62%, respectively. The QFT-GIT assay resulted in more indeterminate and false-negative results than the T-SPOT.TB assay, especially in immunocompromised patients. In conclusion, T-SPOT.TB had a higher sensitivity and resulted in fewer indeterminate results than the QFT-GIT assay for diagnosing active TB.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较两种干扰素-γ释放测定,酶联免疫斑点测定(T-SPOT.TB;英国牛津的牛津免疫学有限公司)和QuantiFERON-TB金管的诊断性能。疑似活动性肺结核(TB)的患者进行QAP-GIT(QFT-GIT; Cellestis Ltd.,澳大利亚卡内基)。从2009年10月到2011年10月,总共招募了200名可疑结核病患者。收集患者的临床和微生物学特征,并采集血样进行T-SPOT.TB和QFT-GIT分析。在200名受试者中,有98名(49%)患有经培养证实的结核病,18名(9%)患有可能的结核病,其余84名(42%)受试者没有结核病。 T SPOT对活动性结核病诊断的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结核病分别为83%,71%,81%和75%。对于QFT-GIT,活动性结核病诊断的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为66%,76%,80%和62%。与T-SPOT.TB分析相比,QFT-GIT分析产生的结果更加不确定和假阴性,尤其是在免疫功能低下的患者中。总之,与QFT-GIT诊断活动性TB的方法相比,T-SPOT.TB的敏感性更高,不确定的结果更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号